Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Norgaard v. Tahash, 110 N.W.2d 867.

137 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(providing that a defendant may plead guilty despite claiming a loss of memory through amne sia or intoxication).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 867 (Minn. 1961); (explaining that when the defendant pleads guilty with a Norgaard plea, “the record must establish that the evidence .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Norgaard v. Tahash , based on his statement that he was intoxicated at the time of the incident .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Justin Marcus Rosendahl, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 867, 871 (Minn. 1961) (stating defendant ma y plead guilty yet maintain innocence on account of lack of memory).3 But our review of Raleigh, Nelson, and Nace, together with Ecker, Trott, and Lussier considered below, compels our conclusion that consideration of evidence not expressly acknowledged and ad mitted by the
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Norgaard v. Tahash , -72 (Minn. 1961).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Norgaard v. Tahash , d 867, 871 (Minn. 1961).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Norgaard v. Tahash , -72 (Minn. 1961).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Norgaard v. Tahash , - 72 (Minn. 1961) ( affirming district court ’s acceptance of guilty plea where defendant claimed loss of memory regarding circumstances of offense).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Norgaard v. Tahash , -72 (Minn. 1961) (affirming guilty plea where defendant has no recollection of the events which resulted in his arrest)).
Berkeley Read Lewis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Norgaard v. Tahash , 261 Minn. 106, 112 - 14, -72 (1961)).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Norgaard v. Tahash , 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Norgaard v. Tahash , 261 Minn. 106, 113 –14, ) to the sole count of second -degree murder and would face a prison sentence anywhere in the presumptive guidelines range of 295 to 415 months, at the district court’s discretion.
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 111-14, -72 (1961), allows a defendant to plead guilty even though he claims not to remember his alleged conduct.
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 111-13, d 867, 871-72 (1961).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of Aaron Michael Hayes. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of Aaron Michael Hayes. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, (affirming the district court’s acceptance of a guilty plea where the defendant asserted inability to remember the circumstances of the offense).
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, (affirming the district court’s acceptance of a guilty plea where the defendant asserted inability to remember the circumstances of the offense).
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 882 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg 882 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 113-14
State of Minnesota v. Donald Kalib John Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Kletschka Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Donald Kalib John Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Kletschka Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. John Porter Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. John Porter Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106, 111-12, ), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Corey Edward Fisherman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Norgaard v. Tahash, 261 Minn. 106
State of Minnesota v. Joe Maria Vento Minn. Ct. App. 2015