Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kindem, 313 N.W.2d 6.

754 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Damien Damonte Carey Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Freeland Jami Morrow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Quyla Chaquita Dennise Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The district court has broad sentencing discretion, State v. Kindem, 3 but may not depart downward from the presumptive sentence designated by the sentencing guidelines absent substantial and compelling mitigating circumstances, Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Ronny Ray Oleson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Nicole Antoinette Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph Incantalupo Minn. Ct. App. 2021
ce is 7 reviewed with the understanding that “[a district court] judge sits with a unique perspective on all stages of a case, including sentencing, a nd the [district court] judge is in the best position to evaluate the offender’s c onduct and weigh se ntencing options,” Hough, d at 397, and that the district court has “broad discretion” in sentencing decisions
State of Minnesota v. Alex Bernard Cuffy Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Eugene Foster Cole Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nicholas Adam Willard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Christian Hamzah Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We “generally will not interfere with sentences that are within the presumptive [guidelines] range,” State v. Freyer , and reverse imposition of 4 presumptive sentences only in “rare” cases, State v. Delk , (quoting State v. Kindem , ), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Terrance Ross Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Manuel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We will reverse a district court ’s refusal to depart from the presumptive sentence only in a “rare case.”
State of Minnesota v. Cory Anthony Klingelhoets Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(noting this court seldom overturns presumptive sentences without compelling circumstances) , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. John Oliver Dybedahl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Dane Michael Vandervoort Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[I]t would be a ra re case which would warrant reversal of the refusal to depart.”
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Roy Luckhardt Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Jefferson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” (), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael Tillman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Alize Khudari Perkins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Reese Schaeffer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Kindem , (recognizing that sentencing guidelines state that district court may depart when substantial and compelling reasons are present).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Guzik Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” (), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Chad Michael Gibson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Delk , review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Levar Randolph Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 217, 223 (Minn. App. 1988) (“An appellate court will not g enerally review the [district] court’s exercise of its discretion in cases where the sentence imposed is within the presumptive range.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota v. Eduardo Delariva-Larios Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Aretina Tiaira Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Aldray Devon Young Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[I]t would be a rare case which would warrant reversal of the refusal to depart.”
State of Minnesota v. Travis James Fritz Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Dean Robert Minnerath Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” d 426, 428 (Minn. App. 2010) (quoting State v. Kindem , ), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Arron Michael Bergstrom Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(quoting State v. Kindem
State of Minnesota v. Cameron Pierre Richmond, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Only in a ‘rare’ case will a reviewing court reverse imposition of a presumptive sentence.” (), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Alonzo Richardson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Terrell Hemphill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Saudi Askari-Habib Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Anthony Cruz Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey George Ackerson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Scott Allen Lipe Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Tony Le Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Chad Joseph Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Peter Roy Byrnes Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Roilan Garriga v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Trent Theodore Horning Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Karla Jean Winterfeld Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Duviaze Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Darrell Wayne Brownbull, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Varlyn Sharp Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Oscar Armando Vargas Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court has broad discretion in deciding whether to depart, and this court will reverse only if there is “a clear abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Ali Joshua Jalil Robida Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-8 (Minn. 1981) (affirming imposition of a presumptive sentence for aiding and abetting a robbery).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2019
7 depart,” State v. Kindem , (quotation omitted) .
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Daniel Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2019