DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele, 837 N.W.2d 703.

109 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Kristi Rae Pawlak v. Steven Vincent Pawlak Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nicole A. Nyhus, Hennepin County v. Sokkhan Ka Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda v. Richard Joseph Sinda Minn. Ct. App. 2020
” Haefele v. Haefele , .
Rebecca Ellen Bender v. Peter Howard Bernhard Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: John Edward Warrington, and Karen Lee Warrington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(child support) ; Hecker v. Hecker , -10 (Minn. 1997) (spousal maintenance).
In re the Custody of E. J. B., Israel J. Perry v. Rachel J. Beukema Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Michael James Pudlick v. Tammy Jean Pudlick Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of: Dennis J. Arvig v. Trudy A. Kawlewski, County of Wadena, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki v. David Victor Rucki, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that, generally, appellate courts “review orders modifying child support for abus e of discretion”).
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning v. Daniel H. Gruenstein Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” (quoting American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1307 (4th ed. 2004)).
In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris v. Robert Lee Hiniker Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Haefele v. Haefele , (making this statement in a child-support dispute).
In re the Marriage of: Mechelle M. Lund v. Jeffrey W. Lund Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Minn. Stat. § 518A.43 (2016)
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Theresa Kleynhans v. Bernardus Andries Kleynhans Minn. Ct. App. 2018
While Kleynhans is right that a district court must make written findings on each statutory factor when ruling on a modification motion, we have held that, when a district court correctly finds that a party moving for modification fails to demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances, the absence of findings on the other statutory factors does not require a remand.
Antoinette Kafui Totimeh v. Clement Olertey Totimeh Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Gregory Olstad v. Stephanie Christine Olstad Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Haefele v Haefele , (maintenance); (support).
Etsegenet Setegn, Hennepin County v. Belay Assefa Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Moslais X. Vue, n/k/a Moslais Michele Xiong v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Custody of J. M. H. and A. M. H. Roland John Hillstrom v. Heather Joy … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
This court reviews orders modifying child support for an abuse of discretion and will reverse only if the district court resolved the question in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.”
Jeremiah John Palmquist v. Stephanie Elizabeth Devens, Joanne Mary Devens Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Peter H. Stier v. Debra A. Peterson, n/k/a Debra A. Hershberger, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
County of Ramsey, Pakou Lee v. Eric J. Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marjorie A. Gomes v. James D. Meyer, County of Clay, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Elio Fumagalli v. Stacy Lynn Fumagalli, n/k/a Stacy Lynn Duesterhoeft, County of McLeod, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
father also argues that the CSM erred by requesting that father disclose his 401k assets, claiming that “assets are not used to determine child support.” Father’s argument lacks merit.
In re the Marriage of: Elio Fumagalli v. Stacy Lynn Fumagalli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks v. Carl Grant Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The district court must also “consider certain statutory factors in addition to gross income and the child-support guidelines to determine whether to depart from the presumptive child-support obligation.” -09 (Minn. 2013) (citing Minn. Stat. § 518A.43 (2012)).
Hennepin County, Hawa H. Ibrhim v. Hussein Y. Dawid Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hennepin County, Hawa H. Ibrhim v. Hussein Y. Dawid Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joshua Ryan Beckendorf v. Jordana Leslie Fox 890 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joshua Ryan Beckendorf v. Jordana Leslie Fox 890 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ostergaard Stillwell v. Harry Alan Stillwell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Beth Ostergaard Stillwell v. Harry Alan Stillwell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he child-support statutes impose an independent obligation on the court to determine the gross income of each parent.” n.6 (Minn. 2013).
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
App. P. 103.04 (appellate court may review any matter “as the interest of justice may require”); n.6 (Minn. 2013) (stating that mandatory language in child-support statute imposed an “independent obligation on the [district] court” to correctly apply the relevant statute, despite a party’s failure to seek that specific relief); n.7 (Minn. 1990) (“[It] is the respo
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We “will reverse only if the district court abused its broad discretion by resolving the matter in a manner that is against logic and the facts on record.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Juan Carlos Carreon v. Michelle Sorensen, Steele County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Juan Carlos Carreon v. Michelle Sorensen, Steele County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Child-support modification is generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion, and we will reverse only if the district court resolved the matter in a manner that is “against logic and facts on the record.” Haefele v. Haefele, 3 (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
in support of his argument.
A14-1257 A14-1445 Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A14-1257 A14-1445 Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(citing Minn. Stat. §§ 518A.37, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Paul Timothy Patock v. Cathy Liane Patock n/k/a Cathy Liane Mehr, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015