Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota, 853 N.W.2d 766.

69 citing documents.

Michael Adam Davis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.” d 766, 770 (Minn. 2014).
Jennifer Lynn Baldwin, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See 30 (stating that “the second [Larrison] prong examines the combined impact on the verdict of all of the allegedly false trial testimony”).
State of Minnesota v. Cinque Daprice Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Cinque Daprice Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(explaining that the district court must both accurately state and correctly apply the legal standard).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Mark Scott Hendrickson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Albert George McIntosh, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Derrick Lemar Forest, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Nathan Wesley McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nathan Wesley McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Randy Terrell Mayberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Randy Terrell Mayberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts review “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Lance Arnold Kingbird, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 766, 770 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Richard Theodore Knoll, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Thomas Robert Tichich, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Gilbert, d at 769 (“[T]he Larrison standard applies broadly to all allegations of false trial test imony.” ()).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 766, 770 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts “review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Larry Jonnell Gilbert, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But “the Larrison standard applies broadly to all allegations of false trial testimony.” d 766, 775 (Minn. 2014); (“[T]he proper test to apply when evaluating a claim for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence of falsified testimony is the three-prong Larrison test.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell, Minn. 2022
Caldwell v. State , (Caldwell II ).
Raymond Joseph Traylor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
John Stephen Woodward, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Lawrence Raymond Burns, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Grant Lloyd Greenwood, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Justin Michael Fenney, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dametrius Ratheal Adrian Moore, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Jermaine Octavious Stansberry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nathan Christopher Braun, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Jonathon Michael Honeycutt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
John Louis Corrigan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Arteco Marvell Rhodes, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thomas John Rassmussen, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Caldwell v. State , (evidentiary hearing); (new trial).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(the Larrison standard applies broadly to all allegations of false trial testimony, not just to witness recantations).
Dominique Salatheia Williams, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3 -73 (Minn. 2014); Bobo v. State , n.4 (Minn. 2012); Ferguson v. State , ; State v. Turnage , -98 (Minn. 2007)
Campbell v. State 916 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2018
Campbell v. State 916 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2018
Caldwell v. State , , 772 (Minn. 2014).
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
See, e.g. , Henderson v. State , , 507 (Minn. 2018) ; Caldwell v. State , , 772-73 (Minn. 2014) ; Bobo v. State , , 517 n.4 (Minn. 2012) ; Ferguson v. State , , 560 (Minn. 2010) ; State v. Turnage , , 597-98 (Minn. 2007).
Ismael Hernandez, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
“The first two prongs of the Larrison standard are compulsory.”
A16-0648 Minn. 2017
“The first two prongs of the Larrison standard are compulsory.”