Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota, 853 N.W.2d 766.

70 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. William Robert Sathre Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Michael Adam Davis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.” d 766, 770 (Minn. 2014).
Jennifer Lynn Baldwin v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See 30 (stating that “the second [Larrison] prong examines the combined impact on the verdict of all of the allegedly false trial testimony”).
State of Minnesota v. Cinque Daprice Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Cinque Daprice Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Larry Tabell Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Josiah David Delvecchio Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(explaining that the district court must both accurately state and correctly apply the legal standard).
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Eric James Reinbold Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Mark Scott Hendrickson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Albert George McIntosh v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Derrick Lemar Forest v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Nathan Wesley McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nathan Wesley McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Lee Roberts Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Randy Terrell Mayberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Randy Terrell Mayberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts review “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Lance Arnold Kingbird v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. David NMN Alonzo Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. William Mendoza Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 766, 770 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. TS’John Thomas Reed Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Richard Theodore Knoll v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appellate court reviews “the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Thomas Robert Tichich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Gilbert, d at 769 (“[T]he Larrison standard applies broadly to all allegations of false trial test imony.” ()).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Alan Mcraven Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 766, 770 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Michael Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts “review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Larry Jonnell Gilbert v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But “the Larrison standard applies broadly to all allegations of false trial testimony.” d 766, 775 (Minn. 2014); (“[T]he proper test to apply when evaluating a claim for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence of falsified testimony is the three-prong Larrison test.”).
State of Minnesota v. Artavies Raymone Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell, Minn. 2022
Caldwell v. State , (Caldwell II ).
Raymond Joseph Traylor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
John Stephen Woodward v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Lawrence Raymond Burns v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Nashid Asmir Abdul-Zahir Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
Grant Lloyd Greenwood v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Justin Michael Fenney v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dametrius Ratheal Adrian Moore v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Jermaine Octavious Stansberry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nathan Christopher Braun v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Jonathon Michael Honeycutt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We review the ultimate decision by the postconviction court to grant or deny an evidentiary hearing for an abuse of discretion.”
John Louis Corrigan v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Arteco Marvell Rhodes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thomas John Rassmussen, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Caldwell v. State , (evidentiary hearing); (new trial).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Lee Stands Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(the Larrison standard applies broadly to all allegations of false trial testimony, not just to witness recantations).
Dominique Salatheia Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
3 -73 (Minn. 2014); Bobo v. State , n.4 (Minn. 2012); Ferguson v. State , ; State v. Turnage , -98 (Minn. 2007)
Campbell v. State 916 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2018
Campbell v. State 916 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2018
Caldwell v. State , , 772 (Minn. 2014).
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
See, e.g. , Henderson v. State , , 507 (Minn. 2018) ; Caldwell v. State , , 772-73 (Minn. 2014) ; Bobo v. State , , 517 n.4 (Minn. 2012) ; Ferguson v. State , , 560 (Minn. 2010) ; State v. Turnage , , 597-98 (Minn. 2007).
Ismael Hernandez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
“The first two prongs of the Larrison standard are compulsory.”