Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg, 882 N.W.2d 618.

387 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jason Cole Hence Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Tarik Toyshawn Smith-Whitmore Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Anthony Sollitto Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“[A] single mitigating factor may support a downward sentencing departure.”); (affirming dispositional departure despite defendant’s lack of remorse).
State of Minnesota v. Thomas David Fogel Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Eric Vines Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Eric Vines Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Because the guidelines’ goal is to create uniformity in sentencing, departures are justified only in exceptional cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Ann Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
624 (Minn. 2016); Soto, d at 312; Trog, d at 29.
State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Damon Marvin Henning, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Larry Ray House Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Larry Ray House Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Abshir Abdullahi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.”
State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Torisa Sulvoris Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Keith Darral Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“We review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Luis Alejandro Esteban Esquivel Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Catherine Ann Skavlem-Short Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Luis Alejandro Esteban Esquivel Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[D]epartures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Catherine Ann Skavlem-Short Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Michael Knoll Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[Appellate courts] review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Weston Marshal Voeltz Minn. Ct. App. 2023
As such, “departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Abdi Dahir Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Dakoda August Scheldrup Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Lindsay Rae Shelltrack-Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts “review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion .”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Paul Kuklok Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant.”
State of Minnesota v. Ger Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[D]epartures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Mark Allen Lacek Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Edward Garrett Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant.”
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Isaiah Antoine James Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply 4 to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Sterling Royce Haukom Minn. Ct. App. 2023
DECISION “We review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. George Jerry Matlock Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Whether to depart from the guidelines rests within the district court’s discretion, and this court will not reverse the decision absent a clear abuse of that discretion.” (quotation omitted)
State of Minnesota v. Eric David Haskins Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We defer to the district court’s finding of remorse, and we agree that remorse is an appropriate factor when determining amenability to probation.
State of Minnesota v. Cha NMN Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court may grant a durational departure based on factors that reflect “the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Gordy Lee Burkhart Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[D]epartures from the guid elines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Anthony Winston Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A durational departure focuses on offense-related factors and is appropriate where an offense is “significantly less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense.” -24 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Kelsey Anne Weidell Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Brandon John Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[D]epartures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. David NMN Alonzo Minn. Ct. App. 2023
16 that warrant placing them “in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Todd Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Robert Allen Mrozek Minn. Ct. App. 2023
To the contrary, a district court must decide not only whether a defendant exhibits “genuine remorse” but also “how much weight to give to that remorse.” .
Dean Robert Hoversten v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 618, 623 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Jacob Hunt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Ajoko Gaye Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts “review a district court’s decision to depart from the presum ptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Scott Adams, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Gary Lee Kies Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Moosisaa Dhugumaa Bulchaa Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Jose Alejandro Mejia-Bonilla Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(explaining that “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family” are all factors relevant to whether a dispositional departure is justified).
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Virnig Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”