Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg, 882 N.W.2d 618.

387 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Deshawn Kejuan Woolridge Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Peter Jay Engen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
4 “A dispositional departure places the offender in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Lee Griffith Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Compare Trog, d at 31 (citing “the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family” as relevant factors that may justify a dispositional departure), (“A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.”).
State of Minnesota v. Leslie Herman Wheeler Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A dispositional departure places the offender in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
State of Minnesota v. Jeri Jerome Knopik Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Donna Mae Bastyr v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
On this record, we discern no abuse of ability to be rehabilitated.”
Xanth Tyler Wilkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
[and] typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant.” (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jonathon Charles Kalvoda Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Dorell Monte Young Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 618, 623 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Jason Michael Slattum Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Suavay Pierre Sidney Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A dispositional departure places the offender in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence,” —in most cases, probation instead of prison.
State of Minnesota v. Felix Hieu Imhoff Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Dontae Deshaun White Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Mubarak Osman Musse Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Fahid Nazir Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A durational departure must be based on 6 factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Williams, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Bjorn Bolton Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion when its reasons for departure are legally impermissible and insufficient evidence in the record justifies the departure.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Cree James Diver Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Monique Swart Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Tanisha Amiea Dunn Minn. Ct. App. 2022
While d ispositional departures may be based on offender -related factors, durational departures must be based on “the nature of the offense, not the individual characteristics of the offender.”
State of Minnesota v. Remona Lysa Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Donald Raymond Guse Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Scott Wayne Srnsky Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Malachi Henessey Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A defendant’s “use of his overwhelming physical size and strength to cause the victim to submit to penetration against her will fits squarely within the statute’s prohibition of sexual assault by coercion.”
State of Minnesota v. Jordan Latrell Jefferson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Lejuan Walter Hyde Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Consideration of a dispositional departure typically focuses on the offender’s characteristics to evaluate whether the offender is 4 “particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted) .
In the Matter of the Welfare of: R. K. W., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(affirming the district court’s determination that the defendant’s demonstrated remorse did not make his conduct significantly less serious than the typical conduct).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Warren Luepke Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” State v. Solberg , (emphasis omitted) .
State of Minnesota v. Deondre Ramon Cush Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion when its reasons for departure are legally impermissible and insufficient evidence in the record justifies the departure.” (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. William Eugene Hale Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Guidelines 2.D.1 (Supp. 2018)
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jacob Nohner Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Luis Garcia Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Ortiz “denied any hist ory of sexual abuse” during the evaluation and Dr. Aiken 1 “A defendant may enter a Norgaard plea when he or she is unable to remember the specific facts of the offense because of intoxication or amnesia but is persuaded that he or she is likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” n.1 (Minn. 2016) (-17 (Minn. 1994); State ex rel.
State of Minnesota v. Duncan Nyanaro Osoro Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Samson Odey Finch Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Dale Eugene McDonald Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Solberg, ( quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Baldwin Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Irfan Beganovic Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Trinidad Jesus Garcia Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We “review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Edward David Stahlmann Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Winston Eckman Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A dispositional departure “places the offend er in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
State of Minnesota v. Justin Thurmon Keltner Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Lidio Roque Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Richard Schwab Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jaren Joseph Dodds Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Solberg , (quoting Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Jason Elliott Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In a challenge to the district court’s de cision to impose an upward sentencing departure, “[w]e review a district court’ s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Tywan George Christopher Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , (quoting Minn. Sent.
Peter Devonn Crosby v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines establish presumptive sentences for felony offenses.” State v. Solberg , (citing Minn. Stat. § 224.09, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Devon Deshawn Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.”
State of Minnesota v. Braxton Monte Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Id.; accord State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted).