Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg, 882 N.W.2d 618.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A dispositional departure places the offender in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence,” —in most cases, probation instead of prison.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A durational departure must be based on 6 factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” (emphasis omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion when its reasons for departure are legally impermissible and insufficient evidence in the record justifies the departure.” (citation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” (emphasis omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
While d ispositional departures may be based on offender -related factors, durational departures must be based on “the nature of the offense, not the individual characteristics of the offender.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A defendant’s “use of his overwhelming physical size and strength to cause the victim to submit to penetration against her will fits squarely within the statute’s prohibition of sexual assault by coercion.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Consideration of a dispositional departure typically focuses on the offender’s characteristics to evaluate whether the offender is 4 “particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted) .
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of: R. K. W., Child.
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(affirming the district court’s determination that the defendant’s demonstrated remorse did not make his conduct significantly less serious than the typical conduct).
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” State v. Solberg , (emphasis omitted) .
-
A21-1500
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion when its reasons for departure are legally impermissible and insufficient evidence in the record justifies the departure.” (citations omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Guidelines 2.D.1 (Supp. 2018)
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Ortiz “denied any hist ory of sexual abuse” during the evaluation and Dr. Aiken 1 “A defendant may enter a Norgaard plea when he or she is unable to remember the specific facts of the offense because of intoxication or amnesia but is persuaded that he or she is likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” n.1 (Minn. 2016) (-17 (Minn. 1994); State ex rel.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Solberg, ( quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- A21-0480 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We “review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A dispositional departure “places the offend er in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Solberg , (quoting Minn. Sent.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In a challenge to the district court’s de cision to impose an upward sentencing departure, “[w]e review a district court’ s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.” State v. Solberg
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , (quoting Minn. Sent.
-
Peter Devonn Crosby, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines establish presumptive sentences for felony offenses.” State v. Solberg , (citing Minn. Stat. § 224.09, subd.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A durational departure must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Id.; accord State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[A] durational departure is a sentence that departs in length from the pres umptive guidelines range.” d 618, 623 (Minn. 2016).
- State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Departures from the guidelines “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , 3 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021