Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Olson ex rel. A.C.O. v. Olson, 892 N.W.2d 837.

40 citing documents.

Christina Alexis Newland, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Olson, 842 (Minn. App. 2017) (concluding that district court erred by admitting and relying on hearsay evidence in OFP case).
State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Chelsea Boyd Kroes, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Sarah Beth Larson and On Behalf of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Olson, (reversing a district court’s issuance of an order for protection when “the district court received no evidence of domestic abuse through sworn testimony or documents admitted into evidence” and based its finding of domestic abuse on only inadmissible hearsay statements); see also State v. Mc
In the Matter of: Maria Cristina Gallo-Valdivia, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“In civil cases, the complaining party must demonstrate prejudicial error to be entitled to a new trial or hearing based on an erroneous evidentiary ruling.” (quotation omitted).
Jay Maurice, as Trustee for the next-of-kin of Jon Maurice, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Serene E. Warren, as beneficiary of the 2011 Arizona NG Trust 102, 8008 Meadow Trust 102, 2011 Lafayette … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Olson, (quotation omitted).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Custody of: B. G. F.; Minn. Ct. App. 2025
County of Hennepin v. Christina Elizabeth VonderHaar, James Mark Hedquist, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
County of Hennepin v. Christina Elizabeth VonderHaar, James Mark Hedquist, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Olson, On October 21, 2024, mother filed a motion asking us to review the district court’s order denying her motion to stay enforcement of the orders underlying her appeal.
In the Matter of: Tracie Nicole O dle and OBO Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Jonathan James O … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of: Danielle Ann Oldenburg v. Daniel Frederick Schanze, (A23-1837), ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of: Danielle Ann Oldenburg v. Daniel Frederick Schanze, (A23-1837), ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Olson, d 837, 841 (Minn. App. 2017) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Ester Berestov, on behalf of minor children v. Betsalel Berestov, Appellant.... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of: Ester Berestov, on behalf of minor children v. Betsalel Berestov, Appellant.... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Olson, -42 (Minn. App. 2017) (holding that district court erred by basing findings of domestic abuse on objected-to hearsay statements made by a child to the child’s therapist that were included in petition and supporting affidavit).
A23-0893 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The Minnesota Rules of Evidence apply to domestic abuse hearings.”
Charles Matthew Waters, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Heidi Sue Heller, obo minor children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of Katie Ann Pyka On Behalf Of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(reversing and remanding the grant of an OFP because statements in the petition constituted inadmissible hearsay and the district court abused its discretion by considering those statements as the exclusive basis for a finding of domestic abuse and the 7 grant of an OFP).
In re the Marriage of: Greda Lynn, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Olson, (quoting Kroning v. State Farm Auto.
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Olson , (quotation omitted).
A21-1320 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of: Heidi Kay Wiplinger obo minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Olson , (quotation omitted).
In re the Matter of: Mikayla Lee Swanson, and on Behalf of Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Edward … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of: Katrina Lynn Deantoni, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of: Cody Scott Johnson, obo Minor, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Olson, d 837, 842 (Minn. App. 2017).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Olson , (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of: Chelsey Lynn Ness, and On Behalf of the Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of: Kimberly Ann Sobiech, and o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The Minnesota Rules of Evidence apply to domestic abuse hearings.”
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of: Carole Anne Rosemary Dobson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Olson , (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. R. E. and C. M. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Olson, (stating that “ [a]n a ppealing party bears the burden of demonstrating that an evidentiary error resulted in prejudice,” which is shown “if it might reasonably have influenced the fact- 8 finder and changed the result of the proceeding”); In re Welfare of Child of J.K.T.
In re the Matter of: Ayano Eto Baylor for self and o/b/o Minor, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. M. P. and L. R. D., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Olson, (“An appealing party bears the burden of demonstrating that an evidentiary error resulted in prejudice .”).
Donny Warren, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Olson , (quotation omitted).