Cited by

In analyzing the best interests of the children, the district court must balance three factors: “(1) the [children’s] interest in pr eserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent -child relationship; and (3) any competing interest[s] of the [children].”

In considering the best interests of a child, the district court must balance three factors: “(1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the pare nt-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”

To determine what is in a child’s best interest, the district court “must balance three factors: (1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent -child relationship; (2) the parent’ s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.” see also Minn. R. Juv.

“In analyzing the best interests of the child, the court must balance three factors: (1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent- child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.” see also Minn. R. Juv.

“Competing interests include such things as a stable environment, health considerations and the child’s preferences.” K.S.F., d at 668 ( ).

“In analyzing the best interests of the child, the court must balance three fact ors: (1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent -child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.” see also Minn. R. Juv.

1 The district court found that mother’s extensive history of “giving false [and] misleading information,” made her statement regarding her Illinois residence not credible.

“Competing interests include such things as a stable environment, health considerations and the child’s preferences.”

In analyzing the best interests of a child, the district court must balance three factors: “(1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.” ; see also Minn. R. Juv.

the record reveals several obvious reasons the district court may not have seen much in the examination results or the drug-program enrollment.

“Competing interests include such things as a stable environment, health considerations and the child’s preferences.”

“Competing interests include such things as a stable environment, health considerations and the child’s preferences.”

d 1, 4 (Minn. App. 1992).

“In analyzing the best interest s of the child, the court must 12 balance three factors: (1) the child ’s interest in preserving the parent -child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.” see also Minn. R. Juv.

-4 (Minn. App. 1992) (noting that on appeal this court must defer to the trial court’s assessment of the weight to be given to witnesses’ testimony).

In analyzing the best interests of the child, the district court must balance three factors: “(1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent -child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent -child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”

“In analyzing the best interests of the child, the court must balance three factors: (1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”

“Competing interests include such things as a stable environment, health considerations and the child’s preferences.”

In analyzing the best interests of the children, the district court must balance three factors: “(1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”

d 1, 4 (Minn. App. 1992).

The district court has the responsibility to weigh witness credibility, and the district court’s giving more weight to certain testimony does not mean that its findings lack evidentiary support and must be reversed.

In analyzing the best interests of the children, the district court must balance three 10 factors: “(1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”

The district court must balance three factors in making the best-interests determination: “(1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”

In assessing the child’s best interests, the district court must balance “(1) the child’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent- child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child.”