Cited by

For a plea to be 5 accurate, “[a] proper factual basis must be established.”

“A defendant may withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the court that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” -16 (Minn. 1994) (quotation omitted) (applying Minn. R. Crim.

“A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.”

It is the district court’s responsibility to “ensure that an adequate factual basis has been established in the record.”

1; -16 (Minn. 1994) (applying Minn. R. Crim.

4 See State v. Theis , (stating that a manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid ); State v. Ecker , (stating that to be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary and intelligent”).

A guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” ().

(citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)).

To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”

The district court’s responsibility is “ to ensure that an adequate factual basis has been established in the record.”

oxicated, that 1 A defendant may enter a Norgaard guilty plea if they “claim[] a loss of memory, through amnesia or intoxication, regarding the circumstances of the offense” and agree that the record establishes that the state’s evidence is sufficient to persuade the defendant and their counsel “that the defendant is guilty or likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” State v. Ecker , see also State ex rel.

Hill, 474 U.S. at 57; State v. Ecker

1A defendant may be allowed to enter a Norgaard plea if he or she “claims a loss of memory, through amnesia or intoxication, regarding the circumstances of the offense” and “the evidence against the defendant is sufficient to persuade the defendant and his or her counsel that the defendant is guilty or likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” see also State ex rel.

To be accurate, a guilty plea must have a “proper factual basis.”

based on the evidence against him.”

The 9 was sufficient, based in part on defense counsel asking “Ecker if he would agree ‘that if a jury were to hear all of that evidence and put it together, they would undoubtedly come to the conclusion that’” he was guilty of shooting the victim.

The district court “need not personally interrogate the defendant prior to acceptance of a guilty plea if defense counsel and the prosecutor have established an adequate factual basis.”

“A defendant may withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the court that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” -16 (Minn. 1994) (quotation omitted) (applying Minn. R. Crim.

(“When an accused is represented by counsel, the voluntariness of the plea depends on whether counsel’s advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.” (quotations omitted)).

In the case of a typical guilty plea, the factual basis is established “by questioning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.” accord Minn. R. Crim.

Ineffective assistance of counsel may render a plea involuntary, and thus constitutionally invalid, when counsel’s advice falls below the “range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.” (quotation omitted).

Ordinarily, the parties establish a proper factual basis “by questioning the defendant and asking the defendant to explain in his or her own words the circumstances surrounding the crime.”

To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.”

A guilty plea may not result from “mental coercion overbearing the will of the defendant.” (quotation omitted).

“[T]he government may not produce a plea through actual or threatened physical harm, or by mental coercion overbearing the will of the defendant.” (quotation omitted); see also Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 750 (1970) (same).

Likewise, “the voluntariness of the plea depends on whether counsel’s advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.” (quotation omitted).

he expenses of R.V.’s and K.E.’s 1A defendant may be allowed to enter a Norgaard plea if he “claims a loss of memory, through amnesia or intoxication, regarding the circumstances of the offense” and “the evidence against the defendant is sufficient to persuade the defendant and his or her counsel that the defendant is guilty or likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” see also State ex rel.

regarding the circumstances of the offense,” but the record “establish[es] that the evidence against the defendant is sufficient to persuade the defendant and his or her counsel that the defendant is guilty or likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” -17 (Minn. 1994); see also State ex rel.

In a standard guilty plea, it is not proper for a court to consider “evidence not expressly acknowledged and admitted by the defendant during the colloquy.” (reviewing a d 852 (Minn. 2016)).