Cited by

In deciding whether to grant a downward dispositional departure, a district court considers “the defendant as an individual and [focuses] on 9 whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

In deciding whether to grant a downward dispositional departure, a district court considers “the defendant as an individual and [focuses] on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.” d 243, 244 (Minn. 1983).

In deciding whether to grant a downward dispositional departure, a district court considers “the defendant as an individual and [focuses] on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”

whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”

whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”

whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”

11 When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood

I. When considering whether to grant a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood

a dispositional departure, the [district] court can focus more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” (emphasis omitted).

A dispositional departure is premised on the defendant’s characteristics, and “on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood

See (stating that when a trial court dispositionally departs, they can focus on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for the defendant and society).

(stating that in determining whether to grant a dispositional departure a district court considers what i s best for the defendant and society).

Nevertheless, the district court generally focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood

at 313; see also State v. Heywood , (affirming departure that was based, in part, on district court’s finding that defendant “was not a threat to the public safety”).

When considering a downward dispositional departure (when a prison sentence is stayed and the defe ndant is placed on probation), the district court focuses “mor e on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” (Mi nn.

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

A district court’s primary focus when de termining whether to grant a dispositional departure should be on “the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

When evaluating a motion for a dispositional departure, the district court can focus on “the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best 5 for him and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court f ocuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the [guidelines] sentence would be best for him and for society.” 18 (Minn. 1983).

While a district court focuses more on the defendant and his particular amenability to “individualized treatment in a probationary setting,” in considering a dispositional-departure request, it may also consider offense-related factors in deciding whether a departure is appropriate.

When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the [guidelines] sentence would be best for him and for society.”

When determining whether to grant a downward dispositional departure and place a defendant on probation, a distri ct court’s primary focus should be on “the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

5 In deciding whether to depart, the district court must focus on the offender “as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

“[W]hen justifying only a dispositional departure, the trial court can focus more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

In considering a dispositional departure, the district court “c an focus more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” Abrahamson, d at 337.

See State v. Trog , , 31 (Minn. 1982) (listing factors courts may consider when *56 determining whether defendant is particularly amenable to probation, including defendant's age, prior record, remorse, cooperation, attitude in court, and support of family and friends); see also State v. Heywood , , 244 (Minn. 1983) (stating that in considering dispositional departure, this court's focus is on defendant as an individual and whether presumptive sentence is best for defendant and for society).

See State v. Trog , (listing factors courts may consider when determining whether defendant is particularly amenable to probation, including defendant’s age, prior record, remorse, cooperation, attitude in 13 court, and support of family and friends); (stating that in considering dispositional departure, this court’s focus is on defendant as an individual and whether presumptive sentence is best for defendant and for society).