Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Heywood, 338 N.W.2d 243.

141 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Keng Cha Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When considering a dispositional departure, a district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Franklin Knoop Minn. Ct. App. 2026
” (emphasis added) (quotation omitted)); (stating the mitigating factors in the sentencing guidelines “focus primarily on the degree of a defendant ’s culpability,” but in the context of a dispositional departure, a district court “can focus more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for
State of Minnesota v. Vontrez Trevon Phelps Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Victor Wade Wang Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Justin Taylor Eschenbacher Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In deciding whether to grant a downward dispositional departure, a district court considers “the defendant as an individual and [focuses] on 9 whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Donald Arthur Merrill Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Richard Fenske Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Randal Darrell Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2026
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Joseph Jesmer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In deciding whether to grant a downward dispositional departure, a district court considers “the defendant as an individual and [focuses] on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.” d 243, 244 (Minn. 1983).
State of Minnesota v. Cherry Lynn Osborne Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In deciding whether to grant a downward dispositional departure, a district court considers “the defendant as an individual and [focuses] on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Tyler James Kennedy Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Tyler James Kennedy Minn. Ct. App. 2025
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Philip Kofi Itoka Minn. Ct. App. 2025
whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Aaron Fierro Minn. Ct. App. 2025
whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Lindsay Marilyn Mayry Minn. Ct. App. 2025
whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Allen Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
whether the presumptive sentence would be best for [the defendant] and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Ashir Hassan Kimbrough Minn. Ct. App. 2025
11 When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Win Naing Aung Minn. Ct. App. 2025
I. When considering whether to grant a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and society.”
State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Joseph Salazar Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
A23-1717 State of Minnesota v. Brian Lee Emerson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
a dispositional departure, the [district] court can focus more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Abshir Abdullahi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A dispositional departure is premised on the defendant’s characteristics, and “on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Julian Leon Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Robert John Virnig Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Tashawn Antionette Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Cree James Diver Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Trevor Stenner Shelley Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See (stating that when a trial court dispositionally departs, they can focus on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for the defendant and society).
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Omar Castillo Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Duncan Nyanaro Osoro Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that in determining whether to grant a dispositional departure a district court considers what i s best for the defendant and society).
Douglas Wayne Braker v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Tony James Hewitt Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Tracy Dean Bullock Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Lidio Roque Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Nevertheless, the district court generally focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dwayne Leckner Minn. Ct. App. 2021
at 313; see also State v. Heywood , (affirming departure that was based, in part, on district court’s finding that defendant “was not a threat to the public safety”).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Andre Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2021
When considering a downward dispositional departure (when a prison sentence is stayed and the defe ndant is placed on probation), the district court focuses “mor e on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Casey Jo Eggum Minn. Ct. App. 2021
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” (Mi nn.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Roy Luckhardt Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.” State v. Heywood
State of Minnesota v. Alize Khudari Perkins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Levar Randolph Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Scott Allen Lipe Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Chad Allen Pryatel Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court’s primary focus when de termining whether to grant a dispositional departure should be on “the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
Roilan Garriga v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When evaluating a motion for a dispositional departure, the district court can focus on “the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best 5 for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Jason David Utto Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Richard Danell Dunston Minn. Ct. App. 2019
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court f ocuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the [guidelines] sentence would be best for him and for society.” 18 (Minn. 1983).
State of Minnesota v. Oscar Armando Vargas Minn. Ct. App. 2019
While a district court focuses more on the defendant and his particular amenability to “individualized treatment in a probationary setting,” in considering a dispositional-departure request, it may also consider offense-related factors in deciding whether a departure is appropriate.
State of Minnesota v. Myron Lynn Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2019
When considering a dispositional departure, the district court focuses “more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the [guidelines] sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Shawn James McEachern Minn. Ct. App. 2019
When determining whether to grant a downward dispositional departure and place a defendant on probation, a distri ct court’s primary focus should be on “the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Robert Tichich Minn. Ct. App. 2019
5 In deciding whether to depart, the district court must focus on the offender “as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”
State of Minnesota, vs, Tyler Paul Wetzel Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[W]hen justifying only a dispositional departure, the trial court can focus more on the defendant as an individual and on whether the presumptive sentence would be best for him and for society.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by