Cited by

d 391, 396 (Minn. 2024); State v. Trott

“The main purpose of the accuracy requirement is to protect a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

Intelligence “The intelligence requirement ensures that a defendant understands the charges against him, the rights he is waiving, and the consequences of his plea.” Raleigh, d at 96 ().

This duty “protect[s] a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.” d 248, 251 (Minn. 1983).

for the proposition that “voluntariness of [his] guilty plea generally comprises two inquiries [including] whether Ouellette had the mental capacity or competence to understand his rights and enter the plea rationally.” But the Trott decision does not support the argument, mentioning neither “ca

“The main purpose of the accuracy requirement is to protect a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious 5 offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

N.W.2d 294, 301 (Minn. App. 2021); see, e.g. , –17 (Minn. 1994) (distinguishing the factual basis of straight pleas from Alford and Norgaard pleas); 588–89 (Minn. 2012) (stating that grand-jury transcript may supplement plea colloquy where it was admitted at plea hearing and acknowledged by defendant); –52 (Minn. 1983) (holding that the function 6 of the record during a guilty plea is to ensure that a defendant is not admitting to a more- serious crime).

“The purpose of the requirement that the plea be intelligent is to [ensure] that the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights he is waiving by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of his plea.”

The accuracy requirement “protect[s] a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

A guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” ().

“The purpose of the requirement that the plea be intelligent is to [ensure] that the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights he is waiving by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of his plea.”

“The purpose of the voluntariness requirement is to [ensure] that the defendant is not pleading guilty because of improper pressures.” ().

The accuracy requirement protects a defendant from pleading “to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

This requirement “protect[s] a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

“The purpose of the requirement that the plea be intelligent is to [ensure] that the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights he is waiving by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of his plea.”

A guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” ().

“The main purpose of the accuracy requirement is to protect a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

A valid guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understandingly made).”

see also State v. 5 We recognize that our view of plea proceedings in district court is necessarily from a distance and based on a static record that may not reveal all considerations involved with a guilty plea on appeal.

“The main purpose of the accuracy requirement is to protect a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

The intelligence requirement ensures “that the defendant understands the charges, understands the rights he is waiving by pleading guilty, and understands the consequences of his plea.”

“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970); ).

“The main purpose of the accuracy requirement is to protect a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.”

14, 1999); see, (holding that a three-foot-long board used to beat a young child was a dangerous weapon); -18 (Minn. 1981) (holding that a pool cue swung like a baseball bat at a victim’s head constituted a dangerous weapon); (Minn. App. 1999

A valid guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understandingly made).”

(stating an unfulfillable promise may be grounds for granting a plea withdrawal).

The record must “support[] the conclusion that the defendant actually committed an offense at least as serious as the crime to which [the defendant] is pleading guilty.” -52 (Minn. 1983).

14, 1999); see, (concluding that a three-foot-long board was a dangerous weapon when used to repeatedly beat the victim); State v. Moyer , (concluding that gasoline was a dangerous weapon when intentionally poured and lit in sole exit of apartment in attempt to kill occupants); S

In a standard guilty plea, it is not proper for a court to consider “evidence not expressly acknowledged and admitted by the defendant during the colloquy.” (reviewing a d 852 (Minn. 2016)).

A. A guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary and intelligent.” ().

Raleigh, d at 96 (citing State v. Trott , ).