Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of J.K., 374 N.W.2d 463.

51 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. R. M. and K. L. E., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-67 (Minn. App. 1985), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
A23-0816 A23-0817 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
To terminate parental rights on this statutory basis, the district court must find that, at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume [her] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” d 463, 466-67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
435 (Minn. 1980) (stating that the psychologist’s report of the child’s emotional condition was admissible as a business record, and that the social worker, who kept the report in her file, as part of her business practice, was a proper foundational witness); (stating that “reports of social workers and psychologists are admissible as business records”), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
A23-0636 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- 67 (Minn. App. 1985), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. D. M. and A. T. C. W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-67 (Minn. App. 1985), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. P. D., D. P.-C., and A. D. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-67 (Minn. App. 1985), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. D. J., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-67 (Minn. App. 1985), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. J. O., J. E. J., and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
To grant a petition for termination on this ground, the district court must find that, at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume [her] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” -67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of S. S., Custodial Parent, A. S., Stepparent, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(noting that father’s “prior abandonment” had been “terminated by his vi gorous defense of hi s parental rights”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: Y. F., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(holding that improvements immediately before the termination hearing were insufficient to overcome the whole of a parent’s negative history), review denied (Minn. Nov.
A20-0743 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
and K.W., d 463, 467 (Minn. App. 1985) (noting that father’s “prior abandonment” had been “terminated by his vigorous defense of his parental rights”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
A19-0947 A19-0965 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of B.C., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To grant a petition for termination on this ground, the district court must find that, at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume [her] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will contin ue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” -67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
466-67 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Nov.
A18-0333 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-67 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. R. O. and J. D. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district court must find that at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume [her] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” -67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.S.H. and B.W.R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-67 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. H., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-67 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. C. G. and T. A. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 463, 466-67 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Nov.
A17-0802 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1(b)(2), for refusing or neglecting to comply with parental duties, requires the district court to find that the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume [the parent’s] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of those duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” -67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. A. K. and J. M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
–67 (Minn. App. 1985), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. R. and J. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. R. and J. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that minimal evidence of improvement was not enough to show that district court was clearly erroneous in concluding that appellant’s poor parenting would continue indefinitely), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. H. and A. T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. H. and A. T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
To grant a petition for termination on this ground, the district court must find that, at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume [her] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” –67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. L. and D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. L. and D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
To grant a petition for termination on this ground, a district court must find that, at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume his [or her] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” -67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. U. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. U. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
To grant a petition for termination, the district court must find that, at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume [her] responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” –67 (Minn. App. 1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating 11 that “improvement immediately before the termination hearing” can be insufficient to overcome the whole of a negative track record), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that “improvement immediately before the termination hearing” can be insufficient to overcome the whole of a negative track record), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court has also held that “improvement immediately before the termination hearing” can be insufficient to overcome “the whole of [a parent’s] negative track record.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
The court must find that at the time of termination, the parent is not “presently able and willing to assume his responsibilities” and that the parent’s neglect of these duties “will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” -67 (Minn.App.1985) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B. 698 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B. 698 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
eat extent upon the projected permanency of the parent’s inability to care for his or her child” (quotation omitted)); cf (holding termination of parental rights of 18-year-old unmarried mother was error where it did not *590 appear that the conditions leading to the termination would be “prolonged and indeterminate”); (holding parental rights of father erroneously terminated in absence of finding that parental misconduct would continue into indefinite future), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
at extent upon the projected permanency of the parent's inability to care for his or her child" (quotation omitted)); (holding termination of parental rights of 18-year-old unmarried mother was error where it did not *590 appear that the conditions leading to the termination would be "prolonged and indeterminate"); (holding parental rights of father erroneously terminated in absence of finding that parental misconduct would continue into indefinite future), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(holding petition to terminate parental rights supported where parent failed to cooperate with court-ordered requirements), review denied (Minn. July 24, 1991); (finding some progress insufficient), review denied (Minn. May 22, 1986); (declining to hold findings clearly erroneous where evidence indicated improvement immediately before termination hearing), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In Re the Welfare of G.B.N. 412 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of G.B.N. 412 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.L.L. 396 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986