Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite James v. State, 699 N.W.2d 723.
- Shawn Patrick Agar, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A guilty plea is not voluntary if it is “induced by unfulfilled or unfulfillable promises.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that the defendant was entitled to plea withdrawal because the plea “was induced by an unfulfilled promise”); (asserting a guilty plea may not be based on improper inducement); (h
- William Larry Armstrong v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
William Larry Armstrong v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that after the time for direct appeal, the only way to seek plea withdrawal is by postconviction proceedings).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A guilty plea is not voluntary if it is “induced by unfulfilled or unfulfillable promises.” (quotation omitted).
-
Todd Deon Rolack, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
DECISION When a defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing, “ the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
- Andrew Audstin Emerson Brown, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
Jade Joseph Nickels, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(holding that if a criminal defendant pleaded guilty based on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, and there is a subsequent breach of the plea agreement, the district court may “allow withdrawal of the plea, order specific performance, or alter the sentence if appropriate”); -29 (Minn. 2005).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[T]he interpretation and enforcement of plea agreements present legal issues that [appellate courts] review de novo.”
-
Anthony Scott David Auginaush, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
And the supreme court has interpreted Minn. Stat. § 590.01 to require that “[w]hen a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea under Rule 15.05, after the defendant has been sentenced, the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
-
Eddie Markeith Frazier, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1; see also James v. State , (stating that, after sentencing, a motion to withdraw a guilty plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The defendant bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the facts warrant withdrawal of the guilty plea.” rev’d on other grounds, d 723 (Minn. 2005).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The defendant bears the 6 burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the facts warrant withdrawal of the guilty plea.” James v. State , rev’d on other grounds
- Dinesh Mongar, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Martin Matthew Lange, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Nicholas Patrick Pankuch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Majed Issac Ijong, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
4 DECISION “When a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea under Rule 15.05, after the defendant has been sentenced, the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.” see also Minn. R. Crim.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A guilty plea cannot be induced by unfulfilled or unfulfillable promises, including a promise of a sentence unauthorized by law.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Jesus Daniel Ibarra, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
DECISION “When a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea under Rule 15.05, after the defendant has been sentenced, the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
- Abas Ibrahim Mohamed, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Anthony Keith Meister, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[T]he interpretation and enforcement of plea agreements present legal iss ues that we review de novo.” James v. State
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See James v. State , (quotation omitted); d at 674.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
to argue that his plea was not intelligent because he was not aware of the ten-year conditional-release term 7 until after he pleaded guilty.
-
Sakariya Ali Aden, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“When a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea .
-
Kelsey Anna Ballman, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“[W]e conclude that there is no reason to treat timeliness under Rule 15.05 differently from the manner in which delays in filing petitions for postconviction relief are treated.”).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
James v. State , -29 (Minn. 2005).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[T]he timeliness of a petition to withdraw a guilty plea is a relevant consideration in determining whether that relief should be granted.” James v. State , .
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
James v. State , State v. Jumping Eagle
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“On demonstration th at a plea agreement has been breached, the court may allow withdrawal of the plea, orde r specific performance, or alter the sentence if appropriate.” -29 (Min n. 2005).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
When such a promise is breached, a court “ ‘may allow withdrawal of the plea, order specific performance, or alter the sentence if appropriate.’” - 29 (Minn. 2005) (quoting State v. Brown , ).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Despite this authority, to support his argument that “[a] claim that the state violated a plea agreement may be raised for the first time on appeal.” But those cases involve challenges to the validity of a guilty plea.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kendricks’s reliance on James v. State , 730 (Minn. 2005), d 879, 882 (Minn. 1998), is misplaced.
- Michael Dejaris Denson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Clayton James Hanks, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When a defendant seeks to withdraw his guilty plea after sentencing, “the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
-
Joseph Milton Barnes, petitioner Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Determining what the parties agreed to in a plea bargain is a factual inquiry for the postconviction court to resolve.” (quotation omitted).
-
Sahal Osman Shidane, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“When a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea under Rule 15.05, after the defendant 3 has been sentenced, the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Kletschka Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Kletschka Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Joseph Michael Smith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Joseph Michael Smith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Armstrong
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests ‘in any significant degree’ on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise[.]” (-29 (Minn. 2005)).
- State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015