Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf, 732 N.W.2d 630.

81 citing documents.

In Re the Marriage of Joshua Laurance Patterson v. Rebecca Marie Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
2 (202 4); (“Factors justifying security for a spousal-maintenance award include the obligee’s age, education, vocational experience, and employment prospects.”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Matter of: David Terrance Kellogg v. Alyssa Leigh Freund Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Clear error exists if a factual finding is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Aimee Lynn Speier v. Gary Joseph Speier, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Custody of LMK & LJK: Matthew Steven Krebs v. Nicole Lynn Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Clear error exists when a factual finding is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Amy Nicole Solinger v. Jason Mark Solinger Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” d 630, 633 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minn. Stat. § 518A.71 (2022); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Pawel Dominik Rzeczkowski v. Carolina Uribe Borrero Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Kampf v. Kampf , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Russell Vander Wiel v. Sharna Ann Wahlgren Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. Stat. § 518A.71 (2022); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Jeannine Colleen Scott Salchow, n/k/a Jeannine Colleen Farnsworth v. Kenneth Joe Salchow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Kelly John Brown v. Shawn Marie Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kampf v. Kampf , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kelly Susan LaPara v. Timothy Michael LaPara Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 630, 633 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Amy Lynn Callister (A20-1249) (A20-1261) v. Kevin Callister (A20-1249) (A20-1261) Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker v. Laura Margaret Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2021
see Minn. Stat. § 518.552, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Martin Sean Schmidt v. Julie Ann Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton v. Megan Caroline Curran Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Maria Rothen v. Jason David Rothen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Timothy John Goettl v. Tonna Lorraine Goettl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A finding is clearly erroneous if it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by 9 the evidence as a whole.” Kampf v. Kampf , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Edith Ponciano v. Felix Murillo Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie v. Heidi Christine Aufenthie Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Christina L. Suhsen v. Karl W. Suhsen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Kampf v. Kampf , -36 (Minn. App. 2007) (holding that the district court abused its discretion by not requiring life insurance to secure maintena nce for a 52-year old obligee with a high-school degree, 18 limited work experience, and expected income of $14,872 per year), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Zondra A. Thompson v. Eric L. Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In Kampf v. Kampf, this court held that including retirement savings in wif e’s monthly expenses was reasonable because “the parties’ savings and retirement planning were an integral part of their standard of living during the marriage.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Lakmini Yamuna Herath v. Susantha Herath Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Susan Lee Wood v. Brad Wesley Wood Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders v. Joseph James Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court acts within its discretion in applying a tax rate if it has “a ‘reasonable and supportable basis for making 11 an informed judgment as to [the] probable liability.’” () (alteration in original), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway v. Kent Bradford Holloway Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Factual findings are clearly erroneous if they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell v. Christine Melanie Parnell Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018); (“Spousal maintenance is appropriate when the requesting spouse lacks sufficient property or is otherwise unable to provide adequate self -support for his or her reasonable needs in light of the standard of living established during the marriage.” ), review denied (Minn. 3 Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas James Davis v. Theresa Anne Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district court thus considers the spendable income of the parties, and the parties’ reasonable expenses, (considering whether monthly savings were a reasonable expense).
In re the Marriage of: Laura Diane Hermer v. Lawrence James Cisek, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan v. Smeeta Antony Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Id.; -34 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Grace Kathryn Adams v. Frank Thomas Adams Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2(a) -(h); see also Kampf v. Kampf , 9 -34 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan v. Jacqueline Ann Hoolihan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See K ampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Michelle E. Li-Kuehne v. Stephen E. Kuehne Minn. Ct. App. 2018
”); Kampf v. Kampf , (“Additionally, the circumstances in this case compel us to conclude that the district court 9 abused its discretion by refusing to require Kampf to carry li fe insurance as security.
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski v. Joan Susanne Pnewski Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs v. David Carl Boggs Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court has discreti on to consider tax consequenc es as part of its spousal- maintenance-award calculations, provided that it has a “reasonable and supportable basis for making an informed judgment as to [the] probable liability.” Kampf v. Kampf , -36 (Minn. A pp. 2007) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Kay Vogt v. Gary Dennis Vogt Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Justin James Jurkovich v. Rebecca Jean Jurkovich Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(noting that “[t]he purpose of alimony is to care for the wife’s needs after divorce, not to provide her with a lifetime profit -sharing plan” (quoting Homer H. Clark Jr., The Law of Domestic Relations in the United States, § 14.9, at 460) (1968)); see also Snyder v. Snyder, 298 Minn. 43, 53, (quoting this facet of Kaiser); (citing this aspect of Snyder), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine v. Lauren Marie Florine Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green v. Julie Ann Green Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher v. Benjamin Moore Belcher, III Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
John Frederick Stolte v. Kathleen Marie Stolte Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Id.; d 630, 633-34 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Dennis Lee Polla v. Jolene Theresa Polla, n/k/a Jolene Theresa Chan Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: David Joseph Williams v. Cheryl Constance Stevens Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Spousal maintenance is appropriate when the requesting spouse lacks sufficient property or is otherwise unable to provide adequate self-support for his or her reasonable needs in light of the standard of living established during the marriage.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Todd James Lindsey v. Shirley June Lindsey Minn. Ct. App. 2016