Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf, 732 N.W.2d 630.

81 citing documents.

In Re the Marriage of Minn. Ct. App. 2026
2 (202 4); (“Factors justifying security for a spousal-maintenance award include the obligee’s age, education, vocational experience, and employment prospects.”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Clear error exists if a factual finding is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Custody of LMK & LJK: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Clear error exists when a factual finding is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” d 630, 633 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minn. Stat. § 518A.71 (2022); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Kampf v. Kampf , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. Stat. § 518A.71 (2022); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Jeannine Colleen Scott Salchow, n/k/a Jeannine Colleen Farnsworth, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kampf v. Kampf , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kelly Susan LaPara, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 630, 633 (Minn. App. 2007), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
A20-1261 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
see Minn. Stat. § 518.552, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Martin Sean Schmidt, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Julie Ann Schmidt, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A finding is clearly erroneous if it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by 9 the evidence as a whole.” Kampf v. Kampf , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Edith Ponciano, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Kampf v. Kampf , -36 (Minn. App. 2007) (holding that the district court abused its discretion by not requiring life insurance to secure maintena nce for a 52-year old obligee with a high-school degree, 18 limited work experience, and expected income of $14,872 per year), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Zondra A. Thompson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In Kampf v. Kampf, this court held that including retirement savings in wif e’s monthly expenses was reasonable because “the parties’ savings and retirement planning were an integral part of their standard of living during the marriage.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Susan Lee Wood, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court acts within its discretion in applying a tax rate if it has “a ‘reasonable and supportable basis for making 11 an informed judgment as to [the] probable liability.’” () (alteration in original), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Factual findings are clearly erroneous if they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018); (“Spousal maintenance is appropriate when the requesting spouse lacks sufficient property or is otherwise unable to provide adequate self -support for his or her reasonable needs in light of the standard of living established during the marriage.” ), review denied (Minn. 3 Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district court thus considers the spendable income of the parties, and the parties’ reasonable expenses, (considering whether monthly savings were a reasonable expense).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Id.; -34 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Aug.
A17-1687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2(a) -(h); see also Kampf v. Kampf , 9 -34 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See K ampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Michelle E. Li-Kuehne, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
”); Kampf v. Kampf , (“Additionally, the circumstances in this case compel us to conclude that the district court 9 abused its discretion by refusing to require Kampf to carry li fe insurance as security.
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court has discreti on to consider tax consequenc es as part of its spousal- maintenance-award calculations, provided that it has a “reasonable and supportable basis for making an informed judgment as to [the] probable liability.” Kampf v. Kampf , -36 (Minn. A pp. 2007) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Kay Vogt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
A17-1036 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(noting that “[t]he purpose of alimony is to care for the wife’s needs after divorce, not to provide her with a lifetime profit -sharing plan” (quoting Homer H. Clark Jr., The Law of Domestic Relations in the United States, § 14.9, at 460) (1968)); see also Snyder v. Snyder, 298 Minn. 43, 53, (quoting this facet of Kaiser); (citing this aspect of Snyder), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Brent Lee Florine, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
John Frederick Stolte, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Id.; d 630, 633-34 (Minn. App. 2007), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Dennis Lee Polla, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kampf v. Kampf , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: David Joseph Williams, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Spousal maintenance is appropriate when the requesting spouse lacks sufficient property or is otherwise unable to provide adequate self-support for his or her reasonable needs in light of the standard of living established during the marriage.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Todd James Lindsey v. Shirley June Lindsey Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by