Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Franks, 765 N.W.2d 68.
- State of Minnesota v. Andreas Jeffrey Joyner Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Kayvon Julian Madison
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating that appellate courts may not re-weigh evidence); (rejecting defendant’s request to re-weigh the evidence).
- State of Minnesota v. Adam Alan Penhollow Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Clarence Jason Bibbs
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State v. Franks , 8 State v. Watkins
-
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Josef Brenner
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating that appellate courts cannot re- weigh the trial evidence).
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Leandre Winston Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Stephanie Hope Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas Michael Everson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Sergio Morocho
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State v. Franks , State v. Watkins
- State of Minnesota v. Nyapuot Dech Kuek Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. I. S., Child
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
used coercion.” Appellate courts do not reweigh the evidence, and generally “accord great deference” to the fact-finder’s credibility determinations, (quotation omitted).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. Y. Q., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Blake Lawrence Fuhol
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Griffin, d at 263; -73 (Minn. 2009).
- State of Minnesota v. Dean Marty Oelkers Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Lue Moua Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Lue Moua
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Terrorize means to cause extreme fear by use of violence or threats.” (defining “terrorize” for purposes of the terroristic-threats statute); (using the same definition of “terrorize” for purposes of the felony-stalking statute).
- Ashaunti Quantay Prowell v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Ashaunti Quantay Prowell v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Lamechtric Irving Beasley
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 68, 72-73 (Minn. 2009).
-
State of Minnesota v. Jenna Marie Bourgeois
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Harris, d at 600-01; - 73 (Minn. 2009).
- State of Minnesota v. Andrew Joseph Casserly Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Andrew Joseph Casserly Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Michael Holeman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Michael Holeman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Djamil Vagif Abiyev Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Kueth Pamier Ruae
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 738, 741 (Minn. App. 2002).
-
State of Minnesota v. Steven Eric Doan-Hanson
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
However, “our review is limited to ascertaining whether under the evidence contained in the record the jury could reasonably find the accused guilty of the offense charged.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Alan Giefer Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. James Harold Black Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. James Henry Maxwell Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Scott Wayne Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Samuel Morton Post, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Dustin Brock Metcalfe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Brock Metcalfe
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In this context, to “feel terrorized” means to “feel extreme fear resulting from violence or threats,” which means “something more than feeling frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Jermaine La Johnson, Sr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Moreover, our supreme court has acknowledged that Minn. Stat. § 609.035 (2022) “contemplates that a defendant will be punished for the most serious of the offenses arising out of a single behavioral incident because imposing up to the maximum punishment for the most serious offense will include punishment for all offenses.” State v. Franks , (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Jesse James Niesen
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The term “terrorize” means “to cause extreme fear by use of violence or threats.” (defining “terrorize” for purposes of felony-stalking statute); see 10 Minnesota Practice, CRIMJIG 15.02 (2015) (jury instruction defining “terrorize” and citing Franks).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A. S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A. S., Child
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We do not question the weight of the video evidence, and we presume the district court found the officer’s testimony credible
- State of Minnesota v. Edgard Francisco Talave Latino Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Edgard Francisco Talave Latino
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(rejecting an appellant’s argument that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction because 6 “[o]ur precedent does not permit us to re-weigh the evidence .
- State of Minnesota v. Tawan E. Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Tawan E. Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Michael Romeo Geraci
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
” In this context, to “feel terrorized” means to “to feel extreme fear resulting from violence or threats.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Louis Meek
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 738, 741 (Minn. App. 2002).
-
State of Minnesota v. Sovajie Marion Julian Temple
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
5 means to ‘feel extreme fear resulting from violence or threats.’” .
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony John Tavarez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua William Dwyer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Corey Lynden Stone Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Sara Jane Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2022