Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.
- Nathan Wesley McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Lee Schober Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Lee Schober
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
DECISION “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellate courts review “a district court’s decision to deny a withdrawal motion for abuse of discretion, reversing only in the rare case.” (quotation omitted); -66 (Minn. 1989) (rejecting more lenient approach to presentence guilty plea withdrawals).
- State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970)).
- State of Minnesota v. Joel Armen Underwood, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Sonny James Drury
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
DECISION “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Timothy David Johnson (A23-0505), Sarah Nicole Johnson (A23-0510) Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Timothy David Johnson (A23-0505), Sarah Nicole Johnson (A23-0510)
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” see also Minn. R. Crim.
- State of Minnesota v. Aleshia Lynn Becklund Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Dorothy Shavon Green
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Direct consequences mean, principally, “the maximum sentence and fine.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Micah Montre Marrison
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
District courts must give due consideration to two factors in determining whether withdrawal would be fair and just: “(1) the reasons a defendant advances to support withdrawal and (2) prejudice granting the motion would cause the State given reliance on the plea.” (explaining Minn. R. Crim.
- Steven Charles Perkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Brian Michael Garner Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Sovajie Marion Julian Temple
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
DECISION “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” see also Minn. R. Crim.
-
Deontranelle Leslie Davis v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
-
Todd Deon Rolack v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Emilie Rae Hewitt
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A defendant may withdraw a guilty plea if “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
-
Andrew Audstin Emerson Brown v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The [s]tate bears the burden of showing prejudice caused by withdrawal.”
-
Jamie Allen Andrews v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
- State of Minnesota v. Aaron Lavell Ross Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
Sophia Wang Navas v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
9 Although a criminal defendant does not have an “absolute right” to withdraw a guilty plea, the district court must allow withdrawal “to correct a manifest injustice.” (quotation omitted); Minn. R. Crim.
-
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Christopher Braun
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (citing Alford, 400 U.S. at 31).
-
State of Minnesota v. Mark Allen Lacek
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Tracy Allen Mitchell
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-94 (Minn. 2010) (quotations and citations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Andre Shyron Kidd Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua William Dwyer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Tobias Osric Smith
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
-
State of Minnesota v. John Lee Backen
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A defendant may withdraw a guilty plea if “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
- Maurice Culpepper v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Lee Sanders
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quotation omitted).
-
Dean Robert Hoversten v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-97 (Minn. 2010) (stating that guilty plea is “intelligent” if defendant understands “the consequences of his plea,” including maximum sentence).
-
Michael Dale Miller v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
DECISION “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- Jason Elliot Peterson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Scott Adams, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota v. Matthew Douglas Paulson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Shevirio Kavirion Childs -Young
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
District courts must give due consideration to two factors i n determining whether withdrawal would be fair and just : “(1) the reasons a defendant advances to support withdrawal and (2) prejudice granting the motion would cause the [s]tate given reliance on the plea.” .
- State of Minnesota v. Jerelle Anthony Ellis Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua Henry Baion Cummings Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Abdul Hakim Omar Erbob Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Eziquel Ignacio Leal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Julian Leon Hooks
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A guilty plea is not intelligent if the defendant does not understand “the consequences of his plea.” d 90, 96 (Minn. 2010).
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Barrett Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Gail Lynn Schauer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Eddie Markeith Frazier v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
George Dudley v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”