Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc., 796 N.W.2d 312.

279 citing documents.

Maureen McCulloch, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We will not disturb those findings “as long as there is evidence in the record that reasonably tends to sustain them.”
Kevin R. Ballman, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 312, 315 (Minn. 2011).
Cassandra Ferdig, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Whether an employee engaged in conduct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
Robert H. Larsen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Tyrone L. Hubbard, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We will not reverse a UL J’s factual findings “as long as there is evidence in the record that reasonably tends to sustain them.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc. , d 312, 315 (Minn. 2011).
Timothy J. Rosenberger, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Whether an employee engaged in conduct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
Jean-Yves Viardin, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Antonio Johnson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Whether an employee engaged in cond uct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
Anthony Richmond, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“W hether an employee engaged in conduct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment be nefits is a mixed que stion of fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
Dennis Field, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Aries Williams, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether an employee enga ged in conduct that dis qualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
Dianne Strohmayer, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We will not disturb those findings “as long as there is evidence in the record that reasonably tends to sustain them.” Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc.
Jacob Holly, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc.
Donovan Casey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Unemployment benefits are intended to provide financial assistance to persons who have been discharged from employment “through no fault of their own.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Edward Curtis, Jr., Relator, vs. ARG Resources LLC, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Zebyderu Abay, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Teresa M. Lentz, Relator, vs. Fairview Health Services, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Dantzler Thomas, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Unemployment benefits are intended to pr ovide financial assistance to persons who have been discharged from employment “through no fault of their own.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Craig Hanson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether an employee engaged in conduct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Richard Braegelmann, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Rhonda Peterson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Appellate courts review a ULJ’s factual findings “in the light most favorable to the decision.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc.
Todd Leuze, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ctr., (quoting Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc. , ).
Myisha Jackson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Song Sibell, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In cases involving unemployment benefits, an appellate court reviews the ULJ’s factual findings “in the light most favorable to the decision.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., d 312, 315 (Minn. 2011).
Jack Grew, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Randall Rahn, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Charlene Hughes, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Connie J. Meier, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Unemployment benefits are intended to provide financial assistance to persons who have been discharged from employment “through no fault of their own.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Emily C. Dzurak, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rhonda Ruhland, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc.
Dan Casey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., d 312, 315 (Minn. 2011).
Shivsaywack Singh, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 312, 315 (Minn. 2011).
Daniel A. Vogel, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Unemployment benefits are intended to provide financial assistance to persons who have been discharged from employment “through no fault of their own.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Abdirahman Warsame, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
David Luckow, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether an employee’s absenteeism and tardiness amounts to a serious violation of the standards of behavior an employer has a right to expect depends on the circumstances of each case.” 4 Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., see also Del Dee Foods, d at 418 (stating that in certain circumstances, it is employment misconduct to be absent even once without notice to the employer).
Pierre A. Goudiaby, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether an employee engaged in conduct that disqualifies the employee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law.” (quotation omitted).
Wahnita Felien, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We review the ULJ’s findings of fact in the light most favorable to the decision and will not disturb the findings if “there is evidence in the record that reasonably tends to sustain them.”
Rebecca Greenstein, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc.
Kristin K. Choronzy, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether an employee’s absenteeism and tardiness amounts to a serious violation of the standards of behavior an employer has a right to expect depends on the circumstances of each case.”
Donald Thaemert, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Unemployment benefits are intended to provide financial assistance to persons who have been discharged from employment “through no fault of their own.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Pamela Powell, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc. , 5 (Minn. 2011).
Mark Scott, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc.
In re the Matter of the Maltreatment Appeal of Watta Yanor Kamara. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at *2 (d 312, 315 (Minn. 2011)).
Sokkhan Ka, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc.
Christopher Herkal, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We will not disturb a ULJ’s factual findings “as long as there is evidence in the record that reasonably tends to sustain them.”
Robyn Potter, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N Unemployment benefits are intended to provide financial assistance to persons who have been discharged from employment “through no fault of their own.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Walter Nachtigall, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N Unemployment benefits are intended to provide financial assistance to persons who have been discharged from employment “through no fault of their own.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Robert Welch, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“In unemployment benefit cases, the appellate court is to revie w the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision and should not disturb those findings as long as there is evidence in the record that reasonably tends t o sustain them.” (quotation omitted).
Brittany Selander, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Whether an employee’s conduct “disqualifies the em ployee from unemployment benefits is a mixed question of fact and law which appellate courts review de novo.” Stagg v. Vintage Place Inc. , (quotation omitted).
Robb W. Jezierski, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[A]n employee’s expectation that the employer will follow its discip linary procedures has no 7 bearing on whether the employee’ s conduct violated the standard s the employer has a reasonable right to expect or whether any such violation is ser ious.” Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc.