Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Silvernail, 831 N.W.2d 594.

653 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Erick Martinez-Mondragon Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Erick Martinez-Mondragon Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Keith Alan Powelson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Keith Alan Powelson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Terry Allen Stewart Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Terry Allen Stewart Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Rolmando Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Rolmando Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lee Busse Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Lee Busse Minn. Ct. App. 2023
6 permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” (Stras, J., concurring).
State of Minnesota v. Jack Guy Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Jack Guy Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Second, we independently determine whether the circumstances proved, as a whole, are “consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Manasseh Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Jason Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Quantelize Jerell Welch Minn. Ct. App. 2023
When reviewing convictions in which an element rests on circumstantial evidence, we follow a two-step approach, first identifying the circumstances proved, considering only those that are consistent with the verdict, and second determining whether those circumstances proved are “consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” –99 5 (Minn. 2013) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher James Colgrove Minn. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Christopher James Colgrove Minn. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Woodrow West Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Under this second step, the court must “determine whether the circumstances proved are consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt, not simply whether the inferences that point to guilt are reasonable.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Keith Allen Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Second, we consider whether the circumstances proved are “consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt, not simply whether the inferences that point to guilt are reasonable.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Trejuan Dominic Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Regina Marie White Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Ellric Alfred Giroux, III Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Anthony John Tavarez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Damien Paul Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Second, we “determine whether the circumstances proved are consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lorenzo Thomas Sims Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Maria Epifania Lopez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Marc Richard Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Micheal Anthony Sparks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. 2023
(assessing whether a closure occurred by considering: whether the courtroom was cleared of all spectators; whether the trial remained open to the general public and the press; whether there was a period of the trial in which members of the public were absent; and whether the defendant, the defend
State of Minnesota v. Michael James Lovestrand Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. David Busch Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 594, 598 (Minn. 2013) .
State of Minnesota v. Edbin Jose Coreas Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Malique Isiah Shaqur Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 594, 598-99 (Minn. 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Willie B. Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Maria Louise La Rose Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Randal-Ashley Villebrun Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Nicolee Marie Holmgren Minn. Ct. App. 2023
( ; ) (stating that the district court is required to apply the Al-Naseer/Silvernail analysis to decide a motion for judgment of acquittal in a circumstantial-evidence case).
State of Minnesota v. David Darnell Jones, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Unlike circumstantial evidence, direct evidence is evidence that, “if believed, directly proves the existence of a fact without requiring any inferences by the fact-finder.” State v. Silvernail , (Stras, J., concurring).
State of Minnesota v. Lance George Iwen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Sharif Hassan, II Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Keith Allen Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Richard James Graf Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Second, we “determine whether the circumstances proved are consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Dak Luk Ret Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Donald Knott Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Matthew James Adams Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Leah Racquel Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Corey Duane Warner Minn. Ct. App. 2023
at 598; -99 (Minn. 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Brett Thomas Green Minn. Ct. App. 2023

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by