Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Moore, 846 N.W.2d 83.

186 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Christopher Kurtenbach Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(noting that, because jury evaluates credibility of evidence, appellate courts view conflicting evidence in light most favorable to verdict when identifying circumstances proved).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lamar Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Norbert Pius D’Cruz Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Carl Joseph Matusovic Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Trinidad Jesus Garcia Minn. Ct. App. 2022
This court reviews jury instructions “in their entirety to determine whether th ey fairly and adequately explain the law.” State v. Moore
State of Minnesota v. Cermor Rio Boakai Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Corey Michael Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Emilio Nieto Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Matthew James Preston Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
First, we “identify the circumstances proved.” State v. Moore
State of Minnesota v. Freddie Tyrone Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jason James Loveless Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Tonia Nicole Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Asa James Kingsbury Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Chase Michael Schwendeman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Antwan Christopher Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Wayland Deshawn Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Kristiana Elena Beavers Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jayson John Rogahn Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jamshid Abdugafarovi Akramov Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Allen Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Robert James Quaas Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Gary Christopher Petersen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
See State v. Moore , (noting that the circumstances proved supported the inference that the defendant retrieved the knife from the kitchen, which was roughly 10 feet away); (explaining that planning activity includes retrieving a weapon or ammunition); State
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Alan Krabbenhoft Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Raciel Zalva Zalvidar-Proenza Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Ellric Alfred Giroux Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. James Allen Buck Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Leigh Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Michael Scott Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jazmyne Amanda-May Shinabarger Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Semaj Maurice Dow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Reuel Moshe Yehuda Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Larhonda Betty Spiller Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Lee 929 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Abdiqadar Salah Kasim Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Gregorio Zuniga-Vallejo Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Paul Mattson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. David Garrett Tynes Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Mohamed Muqtar Jaranow Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We also note that even under the heightened standard of review, we “assume that the jury resolved any factual disputes in a manner that is consistent with the jury’s verdict.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Jerrod Daylyn Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Demarcus Lemaine Barker Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Michael Strother Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-92 (Minn. 2014) (allowing the admission of evidence regarding defendant’s history of abusing former spouse).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua John Blanchard Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Deshawn Nairfe Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Vasquez 912 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2018
State v. Vasquez 912 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2018
See State v. Moore , , 89 (Minn. 2014) ("The anger sparked by the deterioration of the couple's relationship and [the defendant]'s jealousy provided a motive to kill, which supports the Jury's premeditation determination.").
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Odall Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Douglas Lamont Gatlin Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018