Cited by

6 A. Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel The United States and Minnesota Constitutions guarantee a criminal defendant “the right to the effective assistance of counsel.” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

“The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

To be constitutionally valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”

The United States and Minnesota Constitutions guarantee a criminal defendant “the right to effective assistance of counsel.” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)).

DECISION “The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” Taylor v. State , (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

“The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” Taylor v. State , (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 685–86 (1984)

- 26 (Minn. 2016) (distinguishing between deportation and predatory -offender registration in the context of intelligent plea requirements, acknowledging that the requirements of predatory-offender registration “ may be onerous ,” but holding that registration is a civil regulatory consequence).

See Wood v. Georgia, 450 U.S. 261, 271 (1981) (holding that the Sixth Amendment provides a “right to counsel that is free from conflicts of interest”); (stating that the United States and Minnesota Constitutions provide criminal defendants “the right to the effective assistance of counsel” (emphasis added) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984))); d 161, 184 (Minn. 2024) (noting that an attorney “ca

VI; Minn. Const. art. I, § 6

“The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

“The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” Taylor v. State , (quoting Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984) ).

“The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686).

“The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” (quotation omitted).

A valid guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”

“The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant ‘the right to the effective assistance of counsel.’” (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” (quotation omitted).

(citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

or following a revocation of probation, supervised release, or conditional release for any offense,” then that individual must continue to “register until ten years have elapsed since the person was last released from incarceration or until the person’s probation, supervised 2 Our supreme court has acknowledged that portions of the registration requirements are “complex.”

Although a “defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it,” withdrawal must be allowed “to correct a manifest injustice.” (quotations omitted); accord Minn. R. Crim.

(explaining that , if the record is adequate, an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim may be brought in a direct appeal).

(citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)).

To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (quotation and citations omitted).

“Counsel, however, is not required to advise the defendant of every consequence for the defendant’s plea to be intelligent.” (emphasis in original).

“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” (quotation omitted).

“To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”

Taylor v. State, 6 Raleigh, d at 93.

VI; Minn. Const. art I, § 6