Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota, 887 N.W.2d 821.

128 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Velt Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Velt Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2024
VI; Minn. Const. art I, § 6
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Lee Schober Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Lee Schober Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“If the defendant is represented, counsel plays a key role in ensuring that any plea is intelligent by explaining the charges, the rights to be waived, and the consequences of the plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Abshir Abdullahi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Dorothy Shavon Green Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deontranelle Leslie Davis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
To be constitutionally valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Giovanni German Vasquez Rosales Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jamie Allen Andrews v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
To be constitutionally valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Lavell Ross Minn. Ct. App. 2023
And when the district court questioned Ross, he agreed that he wanted to enter into the plea agreement and that he “had enough time to talk to [his] attorney about the agreement.” Furthermore, Ross’s counsel “is not required to advise the defendant of every consequence for the defendant’s plea to be intelligent.”
Sophia Wang Navas v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Counsel, however, is not required to advise the defendant of every consequence for the defendant ’s plea to be intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Saliou Kouyate Minn. Ct. App. 2023
VI; Minn. Const. art. I, § 6; Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 ( 1984); Taylor v. State
State of Minnesota v. Joshua William Dwyer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. John Lee Littlejohn Minn. Ct. App. 2023
VI; Minn. Const. art. I, § 6; Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984)
State of Minnesota v. Robert Anthony Winston Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts review “a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo.” 3 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Jerelle Anthony Ellis Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Abdul Hakim Omar Erbob Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Barrett Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Gail Lynn Schauer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Counsel, however, is not required to advise the defendant of every consequence for the defendant’s plea to be intelligent.” Taylor v. State
State of Minnesota v. Renard Lydell Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Daryl Wayne Moran, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after ent ering it.” Taylor v. State , (quotation omitted).
Dinesh Mongar v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (quotation and citation omitted ).
Martin Matthew Lange v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. John Herbert Hodge, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Dale Eugene McDonald Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Lemar Forest Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Taylor v. State , 5 A defendant must satisfy the two-pronged Strickland test to prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) th at “counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness,” and (2) that “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Lamond Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2022
VI; Minn. Const. art I, § 6
Mary Kate Nguyen v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Majed Issac Ijong v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intel ligent.” Taylor v. State , d 821, 823 (Minn. 2016) (quotation and citation omitted).
Todd Deon Rolack, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Dequarn Markeyth Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Counsel, however, is not required to advise the defendant of every consequence for the defendant’s plea to be intelligent.”
Jesus Daniel Ibarra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Taylor v. State , d 821, 823 (Minn. 2016) (quotation and citation omitted).
Jamia Lee Griffith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ellis-Strong, d at 536; s ee also Taylor v. State , (explaining that “[a] defendant’s lack of awareness of a collateral consequence of a guilty plea does entitle a defendant to withdraw it”).
Blama Jamie Koilor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, e.g., Campos, d at 486-87; see also Sanchez , d at 720 (n oting abrogation of Alanis); (same).
Roy Lee Smith, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dylan Matthew Deling v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Dale Klitzke Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Zackary Andrew Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 686, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063 (1984); Taylor v. State
State of Minnesota v. Matt Monoleetio Vogel Minn. Ct. App. 2021
8 “is not required to advise the defendant of every consequence for the defendant’s plea to be intelligent,” but the defendant must know of the direct consequences of a plea, which are “definite, immediate, and automatic and are punitive and a part of a defendant’s sentence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 18, 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Bruce Renault Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Patrick Barnett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
To be constitutionally valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, a nd intelligent.” Taylor v. State
State of Minnesota v. Ligarius Deauntae Munn Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A valid guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
Lonnie Har Larson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
To be constitutionally valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Taylor v. State
Bradley D. Fordyce v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A valid guilty plea is “accurat e, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This standard is met if a plea is not valid; a guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Taylor v. State
Preston Ryan Lee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Malik Jordan Olsen v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To be constitutionally valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Jacob John Friedrichs Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This standard is met if the plea is not valid; a guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Taylor v. State
Deon Lashawn Mallett v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To be constitutionally valid, “a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Todd Curtis Myers Minn. Ct. App. 2019