Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hallmark, 927 N.W.2d 281.

280 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Christian Portillo Minn. Ct. App. 2022
When evaluating alleged prosecutorial misconduct during a closing argument, we “look to the closing argument as a whole, rather than to selected phrases and remarks.” (quotation s omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lee Rogers Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Andre Thomas Buie Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Hassan Abdi Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Baldwin Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Monique Swart Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Donald Caya Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tanisha Amiea Dunn Minn. Ct. App. 2022
” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted) .
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. M. P. F Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Alfonso Carillo Buenaventura Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lawrence Benson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (Minn .
State of Minnesota v. Harun Warsame Abdi Minn. Ct. App. 2022
807; - 93 (Minn. 2019) (stating that the district court first evaluates “the totality of the circumstances to determine whether [the] hearsay statement has circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness ” and then must “determine whether the three enumerated requirements of Rule 807 are met ” (alteration in original)
State of Minnesota v. Jordan Latrell Jefferson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Paul David Lightfoot, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Amanda Mae Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Tibitha Nyamuoch Both Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Schoonover Collins Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion if its ruling is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic an d the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Lemar Forest Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. James Donald Callender Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Stacia Kay Coonradt, Midwest Bonding, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its de cision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jorge Luis Vargas-Perez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Larry Duane Lucas, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Courtney Jean Petersen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is agai nst logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tyreese Eugene Roberson, Midwest Bonding LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Scott Bailey Minn. Ct. App. 2022
When prosecutorial misconduct claims arise from a closing argument, courts “look to the closing argument as a whole, rath er than to selected phrases and remarks.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Rene Gabriel-Ramos Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its discretion if its ruling is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Marvia Lee Jones Roberts Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Cermor Rio Boakai Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court abuses its evidentiary discretion “when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Victorino Gustavo Ventura Mendez Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. R. B., Commissioner of Human Services, Legal … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Mitchell Curtis Madsen Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
Heather Mary Zigan v. Louis Leroy Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. C. U., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2021
4 based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (M inn.
State of Minnesota v. Joel Orvin Torgerson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Santacruz Espinoza Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Shanin Trevon English Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lance Daniel Dewuske Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Buomkuoth Gatluak Puot Well Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Elijah Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Shane Kirby Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Ronald John Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Allison Ann Mastin Minn. Ct. App. 2021
13 v. Hallmark, (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Hussein Abdulahi Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Quinten Lavel Osgood, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Hallmark , (quotation omitted).
Ronald Regino Altamirano v. Katherine Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Antoine Martez Eubanks Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Butler & Allen P.A. v. Ronald William Kammueller Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[Appellate courts] review a district court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Francisco Velasquez-Lazo Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Corey David Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is 8 based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. J. Alexander Kueng Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court ab uses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is agai nst logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by