Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brown v. State, 449 N.W.2d 180.

158 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Andrew Thomas Cocherell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Mario Patino Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Brown v. State , (explaining that “ [a] defendant is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and contend that the record made at the time of the plea was entered is inadequate” to establish that a plea was inaccurate, involuntary, or unintelligent).
State of Minnesota v. Dequarn Markeyth Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Brown v. State , ( explaining that a “defendant is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and contend that the record made at the time of the plea was entered is inadequate” to establish that a plea was inaccurate, involuntary, or unintelligent).
State of Minnesota v. Darryl Donail Walker, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Edward Richard Krasky v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Krasky also contends that his guilty plea was not voluntary because his vulnerability “resulted in pressure and coercion to plead guilty.” “The voluntariness requirement helps [e]nsure that the defendant does not plead guilty because of any improper pressures or inducements.”
State of Minnesota v. William Deshawn Paige Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Mitchell Le Dac Ho v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
And to be intelligent, the defendant must understand “the charges, the rights being waived, and the consequences of the guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Zittie Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on “any improper pressures or inducements.”
State of Minnesota v. Nathaniel Gerome Davenport Minn. Ct. App. 2020
oted that beca use the purpose of the predatory-offender registry is to aid law enforcement in subseque nt investigations, retroactive application of amendments to the statute “allows the legislature to enlarge or reduce the group of offender registrants as necessary to effectua te the purpose of the statute.” State v. Jedlicka
State of Minnesota v. Alan Danny Woods Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A guilty plea must not be based on “any improper pressures or i nducements.”
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Steven Kalland Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Patrick Barnett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Brown v. 5 State, -83 (Minn. 1989); State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Donald Ray Quin, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Rakeem Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Iverson , , 354-55 (Minn. 2003)
State of Minnesota v. Ligarius Deauntae Munn Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“A defendant is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and contend that the record made at the time the plea was entered is inadequate .
State of Minnesota v. Nikki Jo Hauser Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Dale Dwayne Greer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea, but a defendan t may challenge the va lidity of a guilty plea for the first time in a direct appeal
State of Minnesota v. Markus Wilton Eskew Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“A defendant is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and contend that the record made at the time of the plea was entered is inadequate in one or more of these respects [i.e., that the plea was not valid because it was not accurate, voluntary, or intelligent].”); State v
State of Minnesota v. Aleshia Lynn Becklund Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Kelsey Anna Ballman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To be intelligent, the guilty plea must be knowing and understanding to “insure that the defendant understands the charges, the rights being waived and the consequences of the guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Douglas Ratcliff Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Brown v. State , 5 review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Lemar Burgess Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Scott David Quall Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Brown v. State , review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Omar Kwabena Walford Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Louis Chase, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Johnson v. State 925 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Johnson v. State 925 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
" Dikken , d at 876 -77 (quoting Brown v. State , , 182 (Minn. 1989) ).
State of Minnesota v. Kelsey Anna Ballman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-83 (Minn. 1989); see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Isidro Carranza Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S. J. D. K., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Erik Charles Knutson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on “any improper pressures or inducements.”
State of Minnesota v. Cody Robert Schrock Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“A defendant is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and cont end that the record made at the time the plea was entered is inadequate” to establish the requirements of a valid guilty plea.).
State of Minnesota v. Scot William Yard Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Despite this authority, to support his argument that “[a] claim that the state violated a plea agreement may be raised for the first time on appeal.” But those cases involve challenges to the validity of a guilty plea.
State of Minnesota v. Bobby Joe Houle Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Arthur Rathbun Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A plea is not voluntary if it relies on “improper pressures or inducements.” Brown v. State
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Means Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Joseph Becker Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 State v. Anyanwu , n.1 (Minn. App. 2004) (-83 (Minn. 1989); State v. 4 It is conceivable on this record that appella nt did not understand the significance of the exchanges between counsel and the district c ourt, despite his stated agreement with the district court’s recitation of the agreement.
Dikken v. State 896 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2017
Dikken v. State 896 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2017
1 To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on “any improper pres *877 sures or inducements.”
State of Minnesota v. Bobby Joe Houle Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A plea is intelligent if “the defendant understands the charges, the rights being waived and the consequences of the guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Theis, d at 646; Brown v. 9 State