Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners, 617 N.W.2d 566.

246 citing documents.

A Resolution Reaffirming the Issuance of a Cannabis Retail Registration to Jigar Patel, DBA Nature Creation. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (“Legislative acts are not reviewable by certiorari in the court of appeals, but by a direct action in district court.”); see also Brown, d at 497– 98 (concluding that a relator’s arguments “challeng[ing] the city’s decision to make policy and procedural changes to its process for determin
Jacob Schlichter, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, 575 (Minn. 2000).
Independent School District No. 281, Robbinsdale, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Kent Michael Vnuk (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating that generally “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Application of Jason Kitzman and Rani Kitzman for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A25-1221 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate 3 The J&D reflects the parties’ agreed-to and stipulated valuation date of March 31, 2023.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating in the context of a civil statute, appellate courts generally “apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. W. and L. S. G., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. W. and L. S. G., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Mark Wocken, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, n.5 (Minn. 2000) (stating that zoning decisions by county boards are reviewable by writ of certiorari).
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (noting that, generally, appellate courts apply the version of a statute in effect when we decide an appeal, but an exception applies “when rights affected by the amended law were vested before the change in the law”).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Denial of Line of Duty Death Benefits for Dallas Edeburn. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: J. L. C. R. and M. A. C. … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In re Cottonwood County’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Sioux Rock … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, & n.5 (Minn. 2000).
In re City of St. Paul’s Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Of Comm’rs, (“Legislative acts are not reviewable by certiorari in the court of appeals, but by a direct action in district court.”).
City of Brooklyn Park, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. R. and F. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, appellate courts “apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Application of Janet T. Lamkin, to Register the Title to Certain Land. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Richard Whitman, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Brianne Goad, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Thomas Noree, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Joy Litke, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Samantha Wakasugi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, d 566, 575 (Minn. 2000).
In the Matter of the Application of Marco Quinton Hanlon for a Change of Name. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Application of Jesus Adrian Soto for a Change of Name of Minor. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
A24-0939 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Dan Murphy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on 4 comprehensive plan is a “compilation of policy statements, goals, standards, and maps for guiding the physical, social and economic development” of a municipality.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Shawn Jamison. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Alex Lancaster, Relator v. Department of Human Services Minn. 2025
Alex Lancaster, Relator v. Department of Human Services Minn. 2025
of Comm’rs, 574 n.5 (Minn. 2000) (providing that a county board’s “[r]uling on a conditional use permit application is a quasi-judicial act” because “the legislature has not provided for judicial review of zoning decisions of county boards in the district court as it has for zoning decisions” by other governing bodies)
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. I. G. and O. C., C. D. … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: X. M. B. and J. C. B.-G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Douglas James Williams, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
Aaron Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, 3 application for energy assistance “in the manner [in] which it had previously done”—via email—and therefore failed to provide a reasonable accommodation for his disability.
In the Matter of QC Training Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Comm’rs, (stating that, generally, “appellate courts apply the law as it exists at the time they rule on a case”).
ExteNet Systems, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Comm’rs, n.2 (Minn. 2000) (“If a road project requires 5 alteration of the public right-of- way, utilities whose equipment is within the right -of-way pay the cost of relocation.”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Comm’rs, ; we stated: When determining whether a motion to modify parenting time is a de facto modification to physical custody, and therefore requires an application of the standard to modify custody rather than parenting time, “a court should c

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by