Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of H.K., 455 N.W.2d 529.

102 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Children of: B.M.T., N.B.T., and C.V.G., Jr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consider ation of the length of time the county was involved and t he quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
, A18-1115 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time 8 the county was involved and the quality of the effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A18-1361 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the county has met its 11 duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and quality of the effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A18-1024 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. A. G. and S. C. G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the qua lity of the effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H. R. W. and M. D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Reasonable efforts “must go beyond mere matters of form so as to include real, genuine assistance.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
532 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A18-0333 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was 9 involved and the quality of the effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. R. S. and D. A. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Finally, the district court must consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G. H.-G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Additionally, the court must consider “the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” , review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990) .
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. K. U. and T. D. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Finally, the district court must consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. E. M. and R. B. L., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A17-1336 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
It must also consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. L. W. and S. F. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R.K., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the county has met its duty of reas onable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” 2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A17-0802 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
25, 1985); (upholding termin ation of parental rights under section 260C.301, subd.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. D. R. and K. E. B., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the county has met its duty of reas onable efforts requires consid eration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. R. L., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the [agency] has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the [agency] was involved and the quality of the effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A17-0036 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the 12 county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. T. and D. W. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. T. and D. W. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Reasonable efforts “must go beyond mere matters of form so as to include real, genuine assistance.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. L. and D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. C. a/k/a Q. N. F. (W.), Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. C. a/k/a Q. N. F. (W.), Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. L. and D. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The county’s 8 reasonable efforts “must go beyond mere matters of form so as to include real, genuine assistance.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. E. N. and R. D. J., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. E. N. and R. D. J., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. M. and K. W., Parents, W. W., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. M. and K. W., Parents, W. W., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“[Mother’s] unwillingness to complete any of the goals of her placement plan provides clear and convincing evidence that the present conditions of neglect will continue for a prolonged and indeterminate time.”), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When determining whether reasonable efforts were made, the district court must examine “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” 7 Mother cites the district court’s conclusion that “[t]he current living arrangement has been stable and satisfactory” to support her assertion that the family’s residence was stable and satisfactory.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. A. G. and M. R. G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. A. G. and M. R. G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See In re Welfare of Children of K.S.F., 823 (“Failure to satisfy requirements of a court-ordered case plan provides evidence of a parent’s noncompliance with the duties and responsibilities” of a parent); (upholding termination of parental rights when parents did not live in a stable housing and failed to take advantage of programming offered to them).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H. P., A. L., J. W. H., J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H. P., A. L., J. W. H., J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We agree that the services provided must “go beyond mere matters of form so as to include real, genuine assistance.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. C. and T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. C. and T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When determining whether reasonable efforts were made, the district court must examine “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T.W., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T.W., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Whether the county 10 has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” d 529, 532 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A.D., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A.D., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Whether a county has provided reasonable efforts depends on the problems presented, including the length of time the county was involved and the quality of the effort given, In re Welfare of H.K., 7 review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
It must also consider “the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W. 727 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W. 727 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“Reasonable efforts” at rehabilitation are services that “go beyond mere matters of form so as to include real, genuine assistance.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In Re the Welfare of A.R.G.-B. 551 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of A.R.G.-B. 551 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
This court must “closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether the evidence is clear and convincing.” quoted in pet.