Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of H.K., 455 N.W.2d 529.

102 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: C. B. B. and M. C. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minn. Stat. § 260.012(h) (2024) ; (noting that courts also weigh “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given”) , rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: J. L. C. R. and M. A. C. … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. S. and J. J. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The district court also weighs “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” d 529, 532 (Minn. App. 1990), rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M.C., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M.C., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The district court also weighs “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” d 529, 532 (Minn. App. 1990), rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: F. K. O., M. L. O., J. R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” (citation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. C. M. and C. C. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Reasonable efforts must “go beyond mere matters of form so as to include real, genuine assistance” and consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A23-0816 A23-0817 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Those services should “assist in alleviating the conditions that gave rise to the dependency adjudication.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S.-I. and J. J., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S.-I. and J. J., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The district court also weighs “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” d 529, 532 (Minn. App. 1990), rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. L. and D. J. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Finally, the district court considers “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. M. G. and L. T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The ultimate purpose of making reasonable efforts is to “assist in alleviating the conditions that gave rise to the dependency adjudication.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. L. D., J. T., Jr. and C. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. G. and A. E., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. R. T. and K. M. W., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
For example, in In re Welfare of H.K., this court affirmed a termination after concluding that there was “clear and convincing evidence that the present conditions of neglect will continue for a prolonged and indeterminate time.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. L. U., Sr. and K. M. W., … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. A. T., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Determining whether efforts were reasonable also requires “consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” 2 (Minn. App. 1990) , rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. W. and C. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The district court must consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Children of: S. J. K. W., K. T. S., D. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A district court also must consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. M. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A21-0950 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. A. D. and B. R. G. Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Whether reasonable efforts were made turns on “the length of the time the [agency] was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. J. S. and C. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The ultimate purpose of making these efforts is to “assist in alleviating the conditions that gave rise to the dependency adjudication.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: H.-M. E. R. and R. N. N., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. R. H. T. and P. J., … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Finally, th e district court must consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” d 529, 532 (Minn. App. 1990), rev. denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A21-0357 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A21-0050 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. G. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Whether the responsible social services agency made reasonable efforts turns on “the length of the time the [agency] was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. B. and C. J. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Services must go beyond mere matters of form so as to include real, genuine assistance.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. M. A., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether the county has met its duty of reas onable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. M. C., K. W. C. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. J. O., J. E. J., and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. H.-N. and L. V., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The county’s efforts must assist in alleviating the conditions that gave rise to the dependency determination.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. K., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The county’s efforts must assist in alleviating the conditions that gave rise to the dependency adjudication.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. H. and P. R. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. K. (Deceased) and J. D. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
, A20-0645, A20-0646 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Finally, the district court must consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. M. M. and K. J. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. A. M. and R. A. L., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
14 “Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.M.K. and L.C.S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
A19-1051 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. R. S. and T. A. S., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K.H. and D.C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. L. R. and E. T.-P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The d istrict court must consider “t he length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” d 529, 532 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. H. and J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court must consider “the length of the time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. B. B. and K. C. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. E. J. and M. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort given.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).
, A18-1830 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the county has met its duty of reasonable efforts requires consideration of the length of time the county was involved and the quality of effort.” review denied (Minn. July 6, 1990).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by