Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minnesotans for Responsible Recreation v. Department of Natural Resources, 632 N.W.2d 534.

76 citing documents.

Ashney Helleksen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Banking, Hanson, d at 373.
Tamer K. Embaby, Relator v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Banking, (applying McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)).
JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related Appeal ... Minn. 2025
Samantha Wakasugi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Banking, (quotation omitted).
Bill Creger v. City of Cambridge Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Banking, -49 (Minn. 2001); see also Bone v. G4S Youth Servs., LLC, 686 F.3d 948, 956 (8th Cir. 2012).
Karen Painter, PhD. v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Roula Mitchell v. Target Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Banking, (applying McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)).
A23-0621 JayCee Cooper v. USA Powerlifting, USA Powerlifting Minnesota, on Related ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Henry, d at 883; Hansen v. Robert Half Int’l, Inc.
Daniel J. Keller v. Monumental Sales, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Banking, (quotation omitted).
Zosha Winegar-Schultz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Banking, see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) (establishing a three-part burden-shifting test for employment discrimination).
Jenny Rhoades, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Western National Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Banking, n.4 (Minn. 2001) (citing Camfield, 719 F.2d at 1365, for the rule that “although affidavits that contradict earlier deposition testimony generally may not be used to create a genuine issue of fact, there are exceptions to this rule”).
Raymond L. Semler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Tama May Boe Kerber, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Landform Professional Services, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Banking, n.4 (Minn. 2001) (stating that “ affidavits that contradict earlier deposition testimony generally may not be used to create a genuine issue of fact”).
Joseph Eilefson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Concurring, Chutich, Thissen, JJ. Lori Dowling Hanson, Minn. 2022
Lisa Larkins, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Damon Doss, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Beth A. Layeux, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
James Johanning, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Debra Lynn Johnson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Vicki Metcalf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Scot A. Lacek, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Banking, 15 (Minn. 2001).
Dr. Kimberly Finch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Samson Longtin, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Banking, a Div. of Norwest Funding, Inc., (citing Lundgren v. Eustermann , and Thiele v. Stich , 11 ), aff’d in part, rev ’d in part
Melissa Casanova, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Banking, see also Friend v. Gopher Co. , -40 (Minn. App. 2009) (explaining th e direct method of proof ).
Robert Grado, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A plaintiff may establish a prima facie case of discrimination either by offering direct evidence of discriminatory intent or by establishing an inferenc e of discriminatory intent under the McDonnell- Douglas shifting-burden analysis.” Gee, d at 552 (citing Hoover v. Norwest 12 Private Mortg, Banking, 2 (Minn. 2001) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792, 93 S. Ct. 1817 (1 973))).
Linda Gensmer, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Sendecky, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Banking, ; Lindgren v. Harmon Glass Co. , , review denied (Oct.
Tami Conn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A Xiong, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sarah Dickhausen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bradley Wingate, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Banking , (“In some cases, sufficient eviden ce may consist of only the pl aintiff’s prima facie case plus evidence that the employer’s proffered reason is untrue.
Moore v. City of New Brighton 932 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Banking , , 542 (Minn. 2001).
Abdiaziz H. Hirsi, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Banking , n.4 ( Minn. 2001).
McBee v. Team Indus., Inc. 925 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 2019
Banking , , 547 (Minn. 2001).
Vickie Apel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Banking, 4 The distinction between claims made under the direct method and the McDonnell Douglas framework is the intentionality or overtness of the discrimination.
Assata Kenneh, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Diaz v. Three Rivers Cmty. Action, Inc. 917 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Banking , , 548 (Minn. 2001).
State of Minnesota, ex rel, Robert Young, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bankin g, -44 (Minn. 2001) ( concluding that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding appellant’s reasonable-accommodation claim for her employer’s failure to accommodate her fibromyalgia).
LaFayette Temple, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dorothy Manni, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Banking, d 534, 547 (Minn. 2001).
Crystal Grosch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Banking , (Minn. 1 Appellant’s receipt of the RRB annuity is pr edicated on her continued disability and is subject to change if appellant ’s condition improves.
A16-1668 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Banking, (analyzing disability discrimination in employment).
Seraphin Abou, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sanchez v. Dahlke Trailer Sales, Inc. 897 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2017
Banking, -49 (Minn. 2001) (applying the burden-shifting framework to a summary judgment motion under the Minnesota Human Rights Act).
James Clarke v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Banking, see also McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 804, 93 S. Ct. at 1825.
Penny Kandt v. Minnesota Department of Commerce Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Banking, n.4 (Minn. 2001).
Indira Y. Junghare v. The Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by