Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Mai Vu Vang, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Antonyo Esquire Lundy Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Abdiel Josadac Aguilar-Pineda, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Paul James Steichen
Minn. 2026
I. “To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Juan Carlos Pomavilla Pomabilla, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“The intelligence requirement ensures that a defendant understands the charges against [her], the rights [she] is waiving, and the consequences of [her] plea.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Marshall Adrian Pack, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Alfredo Torrez
Minn. 2026
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that we review de novo.”
-
Ricardo Daniel Peralta Gutierrez, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“The ‘fair and just’ standard requires district courts to give ‘due consideration’ to two factors: (1) the reasons a defendant advances to support withdrawal and (2) prejudice granting the motion would cause the [s]tate given reliance on the plea.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- Alexis Lashun Suggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph Robert Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Robert Clay
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 (1970)); -53 (Minn. App. 1987) (applying the constitutional standard to a plea petition).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Oluwatoyin Emmanuel Aina Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Oluwatoyin Emmanuel Aina Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Shawn Patrick Agar, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Ellis Scott Tooles, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Steven Robert Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Urdain Augustin Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Urdain Augustin
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
-
Steven Robert Anderson v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota v. Cinque Daprice Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. James Allan Denker Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Cinque Daprice Owens
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“The [district] court should be particularly wary of situations in which the factual basis is established by asking a defendant only leading questions.”).
- State of Minnesota v. James Allan Denker Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Tieshawn Stevie Fields Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Tieshawn Stevie Fields Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Sharmark Hussein Jama Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Sharmark Hussein Jama Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Sarah Nicole Englund v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Sarah Nicole Englund v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
5 “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota v. Bryant Wayne Paige Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Bryant Wayne Paige
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
- State of Minnesota v. Quinten Devon Watkins Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Quinten Devon Watkins Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Michael Edmund Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (citation omitted).