Cited by

“If a district court determines that a statutory ground for termination exists, it must also determine that termination is in the child’s best interest.” d 680, 696 (Minn. App. 2024), rev. denied (Minn. July 19, 2024); (“Even if a statutory ground for termination exists, the district court must still find that termination of parental rights or of the parent-child relationship is in the best interests of the child.” ()).

1 (2024); -67 (Minn. App. 2012).

of K.S.F., (“[A] mother’s love and desire to care for her children does not outweigh her children’s needs for basic care .

of K.S.F., d 656, 668 (Minn. App. 2012) (quotation omitted).

of K.S.F., (quotation omitted).

“Competing interests include such things as a stable environment, health considerations, and the child’s preferenc e.” (quotation omitted).

d 656, 666 (Minn. App. 2012).

(“Because one statutory ground for termination is supported by clear-and-convincing evidence, we do not review the district court’s conclusions regarding the other statutory grounds relied on by the district court.”).

7 (2022) (providing that when a statutory basis to terminate parental rights is present, “the best interests of the child must be the paramount consideration).” “[A] parent’s love and desire to care for her children does not outweigh her children’s needs for basic care and adequate nutrition.”

of K.S.F., (stating that “the district court must balance the preservation of the parent-child relationship against any competing interests of the child,” and a mother’s “love and desire” to care for her child “does not outweigh her [child’s] needs for basic care and adequate nutrition”).

7 (2022) (stating that, in termination proceedings, “the best interests of the child must be the paramount consideration” and “[w]here the interests of parent and child conflict, the interests of the child are paramount”); d 656, 668 (Minn. App. 2012) (“stating that the district court must balance the preservation of the parent-child relationship against any competing interests of the child, including such things as a stable environment, health considerations and the child’s preferences” and a p

of K.S.F., (quotation omitted).

(stating that, in every termination proceeding, the child’s best interests must be given paramount consideration).

of K.S.F., (quotation omitted).

“Competing interests include such things as a stable environment, health considerations and the child’s preferences.” (quotation omitted).

“Failure to satisfy requirements of a court-ordered case plan provides evidence of a parent’s noncompliance with the duties and responsibilities under section 260C.301, subdivision 1(b)(2).”

(civil commitment as a psychopathic personality); (attorney misconduct); d 656, 663 (Minn. App. 2012) (termination of parental rights).

“Failure to satisfy requirements of a court -ordered case plan provides evidence of a parent’s noncompliance with the duties and responsibilities under section 260C.301, subdivision 1(b)(2).”

d 656, 666 (Minn. App. 2012).