Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Yarbrough, 841 N.W.2d 619.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
An issuing judge considers “the type of crime, the nature of the items sought, the extent of the defendant’s opportunity for concealment, and the normal inferences as to where the defendant would usually keep the items.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“ Probable cause exists if an affidavit sets forth competent evidence sufficient to lead a reasonably prudent person to believe there is a basis for the search,” meaning that there is a fair probability that evidence of a crime will be found in a certain location
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Probable cause requires “that the evidence sought likely exists” and “that there is a fair probability that the evidence will be found at the specific site to be searched.”
- State of Minnesota v. Guy Willard Blessing Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Guy Willard Blessing
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A nexus may be inferred from the totality of the circumstances,” and the issuing judge may consider, among other factors, “the type of crime, the nature of the items sought, the extent of the defendant’s opportunity for concealment, and the normal inferences as to where the defendant would usually keep the items.” -23 (Minn. 2014).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2020).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Probable cause exists if “there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Nagle Minn. 2025
-
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Nagle
Minn. 2025
Our inquiry is “whether the issuing judge had a ‘substantial basis’ for concluding that probable cause existed.” Sardina-Padilla, d at 596 ().
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that ‘there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.’” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The issuing [magistrate’s] task is to make a practical, common-sense decision” as to whether “ there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
For a search to be reasonable, there must be a nexus “between the evidence sought and the place to be searched.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Before searching a residence, police usually must obtain a valid warrant issued by 10 a neutral and detached magistrate.” ().
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Probable cause requires that a search-warrant affidavit establish that a sufficient nexus exists “between the evidence sought and the place to be searched.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
en reviewing a warrant application to determine “whether there is probable cause to believe that the evidence sought will be found at a particular place,” appellate courts consider “the type of crime, the nature of the items sought, the extent of the defendant’s opportunity for concealment, and the normal inferences as to where the defendant would usually keep the items.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
As the supreme court has concluded, “[i]t may be reasonable to infer that drug wholesalers keep drugs at their residences[.]”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that ‘there is a fair possibility that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.’” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 619, 622 (Minn. 2014).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that ‘there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.’” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See State v. Yarbrough, 9 (“[D]irect observation of evidence of a crime at the place to be searched is not required.”).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A sufficient ‘nexus’ must be established between the evidence sought and the place to be searched.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Marco Deangulus Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Marco Deangulus Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Angel Ignacio Sardina-Padilla 7 N.W.3d 585 Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Angel Ignacio Sardina-Padilla 7 N.W.3d 585 Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Nagle Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Nagle
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Before searching a residence, police usually must obtain a valid warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate.”
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Gould Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Gould
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The nexus requirement ensures “that there is a fair probability that the evidence will be found at the specific site to be searched.”
- State of Minnesota v. Chad William Buckley Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Chad William Buckley
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(explaining that “it is reasonable to infer that [gun] evidence would be kept at a defendant’s residence”).
- State of Minnesota v. Lyndon Akeem Wiggins Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Lyndon Akeem Wiggins Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Paul Scott Seeman Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Paul Scott Seeman
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-23 (Minn. 2014) (citations and footnote omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Probable cause requires “that there is a fair probability that the evidence will be found at the specific site to be searched.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This nexus requirement ensures “that there is a fair probability that the evidence will be found at the specific site to be searched.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Before searching a residence, police usually must obtain a valid warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that ‘there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.’” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983)).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
at the specific site to be searched.” (quotation omitted).