Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg, 882 N.W.2d 618.

387 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michele Anne Reimann Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[A] durational departure is a sentence that departs in length from the pres umptive guidelines range.” d 618, 623 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Ihar Daniliuk Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Brian John Leonida Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Departures from the guidelines “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Tony Xiong Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A dispositional departure typically focuses on characteristics of the defendant that show whether the defendant is particularly suitable for individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dwayne Leckner Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Rex Christopher Kersey Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , 3 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. John Arlo Bowen Omaha Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Randy Joel Bade Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Angel Gabriel Aviles Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Elijah Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Durational departures must be based on the nature of the offense, not the i ndividual characteristics of the offender.” (Mi nn.
State of Minnesota v. Jonathon Ross Rudquist Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , 7 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted ).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Charles Clinton Ames Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted ).
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Eugene Bilges Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court may only depart if it finds that there are “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Lo Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(holding that a single mitigating factor may justify a downward departure and listing cases affirming upward departures based on a single aggravating factor).
State of Minnesota (A20-0305) (A20-0310) v. Dane Robert Mullen (A20-0305) (A20-0310) Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A district court abuses its discretion when its reasons for departure are legally impermissible and insufficient evidence in the record justifies the departure.”
State of Minnesota v. Pierce Gerald Heston Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A durational departure “is a sentence that departs in length from the presumptive guidelines range.” State v. Solberg , d 618, 623 (Minn. 2016) (citing Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Xueyan Wang Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Id.; accord State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Earl Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , (quoting Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Andre Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Damon Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Reginald Fenion Coe Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Damien Damonte Carey Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. David Scott Bothe Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Departures “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Ronny Ray Oleson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
James Eugene Love v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See State v. Solberg , - 25 (Minn. 2016) (holding that a single mitigating factor may warrant downward durational departur e).
State of Minnesota v. Nicole Antoinette Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A downward departure may be ju stified if “the defendant’s conduct was significantly less serious than that typically in volved in the commission of the offense.” (quotation omitted); (affirming district court’s downward durational departure).
State of Minnesota v. Alex Bernard Cuffy Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Solberg , (quoting Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Eugene Foster Cole Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to ap ply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
Nicholas Adam Willard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Christian Hamzah Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Although a dispositional departure is typically based on offender -specific characteristics, a district court may consider both offender- and offense-related factors when deciding whether to grant a dispositional departure, State v. Chaklos , d 225, 228 (Minn. 1995).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Terrance Ross Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Manuel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Therefore, departures are discouraged unless “there are ‘identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances to support a departure.’ ” (Minn .
State of Minnesota v. Dane Michael Vandervoort Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Roy Luckhardt Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael Tillman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Guzik Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Joseph Melius Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Reese Schaeffer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court must focus on the defendant in considering a dispositional departure by analyzing factors such as “defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family.” (
State of Minnesota v. Aldray Devon Young Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Joseph Rossbach Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Travis James Fritz Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Alonzo Richardson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-24 (Minn. 2016) (first two citations altered).
State of Minnesota v. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Phuc Trong Nguyen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Dushawn Lee Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Marquey Birgans Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey George Ackerson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Solberg , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Josi Ann Adelman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jason Cory Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2020