Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reed v. State, 925 N.W.2d 11.
- State of Minnesota v. Lonny Slade Glover Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Sheila Maurise Burski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. James Lockhart Lang Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. James Lockhart Lang Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Lance Arnold Kingbird v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A petitioner’s allegations in support of a hearing “must be more than argumentative assertions without factual support,” (quotation omitted), and “[ i]f material facts that would entitle a petitioner to relief are in dispute, the court must grant a hearing,”
- State of Minnesota v. Abdulahi Dahir Salad Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Ashaunti Quantay Prowell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota,
Minn. 2021
12 State, n.5 (Minn. 2019).
-
William Dumont White v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-85 (Minn. 1982); see also Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87-88 (7th Cir. 1928); -27 (Minn. 2019).
- Jose Santoya Juarez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
Lawrence Silas Kostohryz v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
5 petition for postconviction relief, including denial without a hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
- Jonah James Hawkins v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
Gerald James Risk v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
DECISION “We review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief, including denial without a hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Eric Clayton Nord
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Corroborative evidence “must affirm the truth of the accomplice’s testimony and point to the guilt of the defendant in some substan tial degree”; but such evidence “need not, standing alone, be sufficient to support a conviction.”
-
Emily Anna Jones v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief, including denial without a hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
- Tommy Thomas Corrales v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota v. Pierce Gerald Heston Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Ronnie Bila Shaka v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Bruce Everett Boyd Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Daniel Negase Asefaw Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Christopher Lee Holloway v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. William Daniel Finley Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota v. Rani Lee Carpenter
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A postconviction cour t “abuses its discretion if it exercised its 3 discretion in an arbitrary or capricious manner, based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law, or made clearly erroneous factual findings.” Reed v. State , (quotation omitted).
-
Erick Lamont Lindsey v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.”
- Prince Lashone Holt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Christopher London Walker v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.” Reed v. State
- Stanley Paul Wenell-Jack v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Alonzo Jefferson
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
must affirm the truth of the accomplice’s testimony and point to the guilt of the def endant in some substantial deg ree.” Reed v. State , (quo tation omitted).
-
Antone Larron Owens v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.” Reed v. State
- A18-1962 A18-1963 Philip Lee Carlson (A18-1162, A18-1962), Virginia Marie Carlson (A18-1163, A18-1963) v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Johnathan Bernard Edwards v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.” Reed v. State
- Odell v. State 931 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2019
-
Odell v. State
931 N.W.2d 103
Minn. 2019
Reed v. State , , 18 (Minn. 2019) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).