Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Reed v. State, 925 N.W.2d 11.

33 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Sheila Maurise Burski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. James Lockhart Lang Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. James Lockhart Lang Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lance Arnold Kingbird, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A petitioner’s allegations in support of a hearing “must be more than argumentative assertions without factual support,” (quotation omitted), and “[ i]f material facts that would entitle a petitioner to relief are in dispute, the court must grant a hearing,”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
12 State, n.5 (Minn. 2019).
William Dumont White, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-85 (Minn. 1982); see also Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87-88 (7th Cir. 1928); -27 (Minn. 2019).
Jose Santoya Juarez, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Lawrence Silas Kostohryz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
5 petition for postconviction relief, including denial without a hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
Jonah James Hawkins, petitioner, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Gerald James Risk, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
DECISION “We review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief, including denial without a hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Corroborative evidence “must affirm the truth of the accomplice’s testimony and point to the guilt of the defendant in some substan tial degree”; but such evidence “need not, standing alone, be sufficient to support a conviction.”
Emily Anna Jones, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief, including denial without a hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
Tommy Thomas Corrales, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ronnie Bila Shaka, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Christopher Lee Holloway, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A postconviction cour t “abuses its discretion if it exercised its 3 discretion in an arbitrary or capricious manner, based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law, or made clearly erroneous factual findings.” Reed v. State , (quotation omitted).
Erick Lamont Lindsey, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.”
Prince Lashone Holt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Christopher London Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.” Reed v. State
Stanley Paul Wenell-Jack, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
must affirm the truth of the accomplice’s testimony and point to the guilt of the def endant in some substantial deg ree.” Reed v. State , (quo tation omitted).
Antone Larron Owens, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.” Reed v. State
A18-1163 A18-1962 A18-1963 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Johnathan Bernard Edwards, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
for an abuse of discretion.” Reed v. State
Odell v. State 931 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2019
Odell v. State 931 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2019
Reed v. State , , 18 (Minn. 2019) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).