Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp., 752 N.W.2d 518.

59 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael Tillman Minn. 2026
“[W]e presume that a judge has discharged her duties properly.”
In Re the Marriage of: Sarah Lynne Douglass v. Joshua Gary Olson, County of Clay, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Olson asserts, in a conclusory way, that the district court’s non-enforcement of the temporary order “demonstrates judicial bias.” It may be presumed that “a judge has discharged her duties properly.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 518, 522 (Minn. 2008).
In Re the Custody of MIVB; Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Finally, while father alleges that the district court erred in disregarding his “reasonable arguments,” a mere adverse ruling is not proof of bias, and we presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly,”
Sarah Nicole Belich and on Behalf of Minor Child(ren), petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellate courts presume a district court discharges its duties “properly,” and we do not infer bias from adverse rulings
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But “adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias .” d 518, 522 (Minn. 2008).
In the Matter of the Ronald E. Roehrs Trust Dated August 9, 1999. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Custody of J. K. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.”
Walter Smith v. Eric A. Johnson, Steven Scott Properties Management, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.”
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.”
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
She asks us to “take action in regard to [the judge’s] improper handling of [the] case” and to ensure that the judge be “completely removed from any future proceedings in regard to [wife].” We presume that district court judges properly discharge all judicial duties, and will not impute bias from adverse rulings or critical remarks, Byers v. Comm’r of Revenue
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mervel George Jones, III, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A25-0147 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A25-0090 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Charles Ward, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.” Hannon v. State
In re the Trust of the Thomas Karakash Family Trust and the Ann Karakash Family Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Estate of Lillian Clara Wennes, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.”
Valerie Steiner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lydia Louise Monahan, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
However, just as we presume district court judges discharge their duties properly, we also presume that—absent proof to the contrary — defense counsel has properly discharged their ethical duties, both to their clients and to the court.
Kryzta Ellyzabeth-Marie Martinez, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Donald J Brown, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that the district court “judge has discharged her duties properly.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Custody of: B. G. F.; Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[B]ias must be proved in light of the record as a whole” and “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.” .
Larry Nettles, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Susan Patricia Evans, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Heidi Ann Collins, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kristopher Lee Roybal, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Previous adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.”
Freweini Sium, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.” Hannon v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Terance Simmons, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: James Allen Martin. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Hannon v. State , (noting that “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias”).
In the Matter of the Children of: S. L. L. and M. J. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Craig David Halicki, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Joshua Raymond Armendariz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(explaining that judicial-bias claims not raised on direct appeal after conviction are Knaffla-barred).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Rather, the bias must be proved in light of the record as a whole.” Hannon v. State , (citation omitted).
Nicholas David Wivinus, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kevin Terrance Hannon, Minn. 2021
Hannon v. State (Hannon III)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Further, “adverse rulings by themselves do no t demonstrate judicial bias.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
As to Laster’s argument that the sentencing judge was biased, “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial basis.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Prince Lashone Holt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We “presume that a judge has discharged her duties properly.” Hannon v. State
State v. Harvey 932 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2019
See, e.g. , State v. Davis , , 539 n.10 (Minn. 2012) (determining that appellant's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims "are without merit because counsel's failure to raise meritless objections is not ineffective assistance of counsel"); Hannon v. State , , 522 (Minn. 2008) (same).
A18-1163 A18-1962 A18-1963 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And although a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to a fair and impartial judge, we 13 “presume that a judge has discharged her duties properly.” d 518, 522 (Minn. 2008).