Cited by

“A finding is clearly erroneous only if there is no reasonable evidence to support the finding or when an appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” (quotation omitted).

“[P]rogramming” is “a specialized system of services, opportunities, or projects designed to meet a relevant behavioral or social need of the child.” d 28, 38 (Minn. 2014).

then ran across the parking lot in the direction of a green Kia 1 “For purposes of a certification determination, the charges against the child and the factual allegations of the petition are presumed true.”

3 The state also argues that, in analyzing J.J.B.’s programming history under the fourth public-safety factor, the district court misapplied by disregarding J.J.B.’s lack of compliance with a Benton County CHIPS- 8 “When a child is alleged to have committed, after becoming 14 years of age, an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult, the [district] court may enter an order certifying the proceeding for action under the

“For purposes of a certification determination, the charges against the child and the factual allegations of the petition are presumed true.” d 28, 38 (Minn. 2014).

“A finding is clearly erroneous only if there is no reasonable evidence to support the finding or when an appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” (quotation omitted).

“A finding is clearly erroneous only if there is no reasonable evidence to support the finding or when an appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” (quotations omitted).

“W e will not disturb a finding about whether public safety would be served by retaining the proceeding in juvenile court unless it is clearly erroneous.”

-35 (Minn. 2014); cf. In re Welfare of D.M.D.

“A finding is clearly erroneous only if there is no reasonable evidence to support the finding or when an appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” d 28, 35 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).

(“On matters of credibility and the weight to be given the testimony of witnesses, we defer to the juvenile court.”).

8(b) (2016); 40 (Minn. 2014) (juvenile certified as an a dult where he did not meet his burden that retaining him under EJJ supervision served public safety).

A finding is clearly erroneous only if there is no reasonable evidence to support the finding in the record or this court is left with the 5 “definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” d 28, 35 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).

A finding of fact “is clearly erroneous only if there is no reasonable evidence to support the finding or when an appellate court is left with the definite and firm c onviction that a mistake occurred.” (citing State v. Rhoads , ).

40 (Minn. 2014) ("[W]e defer to the juvenile court's determination on the credibility and weight to be given [to] witnesses' testimony."); State v. Huss , , 292 (Minn. 1993) ("The weight and credibility of the witnesses is for the trier of fact.").

-35 (Minn. 2014) (citation omitted).

This court “review[s] the juvenile court’s decision to certify a child to adult court for an abuse of discretion.”