Cited by

To be clear, Basswood “must know that he is violating the statute when the violation occurs.”

The accuracy requirement “protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he could have been convicted of at trial.”

“Once a guilty plea has been entered, there is no absolute right to withdraw it.”

“The plain text of the statute suggests that the defendant must know that he is violating the statute when the violation occurs.” d 600, 603 (Minn. 2017).

“Once a guilty plea has been entered, there is no absolute right to withdraw it.”

“Once a guilty plea has been entered, there is no absolute right to withdraw it.”

“Once a guilty plea has been entered, there is no absolute right to withdraw it.”

“Knowingly” is an adverb that modifies “violates.”

(noting that statements conflicting with a valid plea may be “withdrawn or corrected”).

This is unlike State 6 v. Mikulak, in which the defendant’s “statements negated the mens rea element of the charged offense” and the Minnesota Supreme Court consequently held that “the factual basis fail[ed] to satisfy the accuracy requirement.”

9 Mohammed insists that he made a statement negating his guilt of at least one essential element of first -degree aggravated robbery and that the accuracy of his plea could be rehabilitated only if he withdrew or corrected his purportedly problematic statement.

“[A] factual basis is inadequate when the defendant makes stateme nts that negate an essential element of the charged crime because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty.” (quotation omitted).

Although ignorance of the law is generally not a defense, knowledge of the law is an element of an offense “when the statute’s text requires it.” n.5 (Minn. 2017).

And “[t]he defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”

“The accuracy requirement protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he could have been convicted of at trial.” ().

“For a guilty plea to be accurate, a proper factual basis must be established.”

“The accuracy requirement protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he could have been convicted of at trial.” d 600, 603 (Minn. 2017) .

The accuracy standard “protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he could have been convicted of at trial.”

“[K]nowledge of the law at the time of the violation is an element of the offense of knowingly violating a provision of the predatory-offender- registration statute.”

(reversing a conviction after a guilty plea where during the plea colloquy, the defendant stated he did not knowingly violate the predatory offender registration statute and this statement was not 2 Portions of Jones’s brief appear to argue that his statement at the sentencing hearing indicate

The accuracy standard “protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he could have been convicted of at trial.”

State v. Iverson , –50 (Minn. 2003); (holding that a guilty plea was inadequate when the defendant’s plea indicated that he did not “know” about the predatory registration requirement, thus negating the “knowingly” element of the crime).

“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”

“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”

Lussier v. State , State v. Trott , –52 (Minn. 1983).

“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support [their] claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”

“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”

“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”