Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mikulak, 903 N.W.2d 600.

92 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Mario Patino Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”
Tescil Romalis Mason-Kimmons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Dequarn Markeyth Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Darryl Donail Walker, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jaston Cody Mattson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Paul Wenell-Jack Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(holding that the factual basis of defendant’s plea was insufficient because de fendant made statements that negated the mens rea element of thei r charged offense).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew James Preston Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Edward Richard Krasky v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The defendant bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”
Christopher Paul Mattson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“The validity of a guilty plea .
State of Minnesota v. Brian Scott Labs Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Yet appellant “bears the burden of establishing the facts that support his claim that the guilty plea is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Eugene Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2021
While ignorance of the law does not generally excuse criminal liability, “when knowledge of the law is an element of the offense, mistake of law is a defense because it negates the existence of a required mental state.”
State of Minnesota v. Alex Bernard Cuffy Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alexander Depiano Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Richard James Gibson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-04 (Minn. 2017) (providing that “the knowledge and the violation must occur at the same time ”).
State of Minnesota v. Trejuan Dominic Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Raciel Zalva Zalvidar-Proenza Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Anthony Paul Schatz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
4 “The accuracy requirement protects the defendant f rom pleading guilty to a charge more serious than he could have been convicted of at trial.” d 600, 603 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Ellric Alfred Giroux Minn. Ct. App. 2020
5(a); State v. Mikulak , -04 (Minn. 2017 ).
State of Minnesota (A18-1999) (A18-1957,) v. Torrance Lee Royster (A18-1957) (A18-1999) Minn. Ct. App. 2019
5(a); State v. Mikulak , -04 (Minn. 2017) (concluding that an offender must know that he or she violated the statute when the violation occurred).
State of Minnesota v. James Robert Bazoff Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Mikulak , -04 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw his guilty plea, but must be allowed to do so if “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice ,” Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Markus Wilton Eskew Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jacob John Friedrichs Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Markhel D. Franklin v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Alarcon 932 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 2019
State v. Alarcon 932 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 2019
State v. Mikulak , , 603 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Lemar Burgess Minn. Ct. App. 2019
While we would not consider the statement in the complaint regarding refusing the PBT if Burgess had negated that fact during his plea, (holding that plea lacked factual basis when the defendant negated an essential element of the crime), Burgess did not negate that he refused to take a sc reening test.
State of Minnesota v. Omar Kwabena Walford Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Veterine Nicole McGhee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Mikulak , -04 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Curtis McCain, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“Accordingly, the knowledge and the violation must occur at the same time.”).
In Re Charges Of Unprofessional Conduct 924 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 2019
In Re Charges Of Unprofessional Conduct 924 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 2019
State v. Mikulak , , 603 (Minn. 2017) ; see also State v. Watkins , , 30 (Minn. 2013).
State v. Jones 921 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Jones 921 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. David James Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Marcellus Richmond Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Mikulak , -04 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Alarcon, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Mikulak, 9 -04 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Grant David Hendrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “Once a guilty plea has been entered, ther e is no absolute right to withdraw it.”
State of Minnesota v. Lloyd Edward Pugh Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Erik Charles Knutson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “Once a guilty plea has been entered, there is no absolute right to withdraw it.”
State of Minnesota v. Darrick James Bellecourt Minn. Ct. App. 2018

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by