Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ganguli v. University of Minnesota, 512 N.W.2d 918.

124 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Abdihafid Hariri Hassan Yusuf, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or (2024) (child support).
Matter of the Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Relator’s d 918 (Minn. App. 1994), is misguided.
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Minnesota, n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In the Matter of the Formal Complaint and Request for Relief by the Minnesota Solar Advocates. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation); (stating that inadequately briefed issues are not properly before the court).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Mitchell Pierson. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minnesota, d 918, 919 n. 1 (Minn. App. 1984).
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minn., -20 n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) ( declining to address allegations in an appellate brief unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Groebner and Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minn., -20 n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating that this court declines to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
State of Minnesota v. Edin Gaspar Cruz Flores AKA Marcelino Rivera Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Edin Gaspar Cruz Flores AKA Marcelino Rivera Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (same).
State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994).
In re the Marriage of: Valentin Arkadievich Povarchuk, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal authority).
Jhonathan J. Robinson v. Robert R. Amos Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jhonathan J. Robinson v. Robert R. Amos Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Mark J. Kallenbach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Minn ., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Wayne E. Hukriede, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994).
Marthamae Kottschade, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Shawnae Feltus, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation); see also State, Dep’t of Lab.
Joseph Eilefson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating we decline to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Joni T. White, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating the court of appeals declines to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
William H. Davis, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994).
Peter Gerard Lonergan, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating the court of appeals declines to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Minn. , n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating that the court of appeals declines to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address “allegations” unsupported by legal analysis or citation); Ward v. El Rancho Manana, Inc., d 439, 448–49 (Minn. App. 2020) (“[P]arties forfeit any issues that they do not argue in their brief,” and appellant failed to argue the issue “in their principal brie
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Docks of White Bear Lake, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994 ) (stating court of appeals declines to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In the Matter of: Justin Bennek. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
of Minn. , n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Maine Heights LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating court of appeals decline s to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In re the Estate of Vernon G. Engelkes, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Minn. , n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (court of appeals declined to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Megan Guetzkow, as mother and natural guardian of E.I., a minor, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Minn., n.1 9 (Minn. App. 1994).
In re the Billie V. Darkenwald Revocable Trust, dated January 21, 1983, restated February 5, 1999, as amended, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declin ing to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation); see also Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., (applying this aspect of Schoepke).
Town of West Lakeland, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (noting that this court declines to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Linde Sayen, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., d 918, 919 n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) ( noting that the court of appeals declines to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Ngozi Egwim, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. J. C., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to decide an argument that contained no legal analysis or citation).
Waasohn Dorliae, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to addre ss claims on appeal that are not supported by any legal analysis or citation).
Friends to Restore St. Mary's, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating arguments unsupported by legal analysis or citation need not be addressed).
Waterford Township, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn. , n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (noting that relator’s failure to support allegations with constitutional analysis or citation result in forfeiture of her arguments).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
David Wayne Benolt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (stating that the court of appeals declines to addre ss allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In the Matter of: Naomi Rae Marx, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See, n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In the Matter of a Petition for Decertification of an Exclusive Representative Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address allegations unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Kay Vogt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address issues unsupported by legal analysis or citation).
Jerome Robert Beck, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Minn. , n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (citing Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. , 290 Minn. 518, 519, ).
Barclays Bank Delaware, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Minn., n.1 (Minn. App. 1994) (declining to address due-process arguments unsupported by constitutional analysis or citation).
Caleb Wesen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Neegonee Brunner, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Minn., -20 n.1 (Minn. App. 7 1994) (stating this court declines to consider allegations unsupported by legal analysis).