Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rhodes, 675 N.W.2d 323.

88 citing documents.

Ricardo Daniel Peralta Gutierrez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Lastly, after the district court imposed the sentence of 144 month’s imprisonment, it asked Peralta Gutierrez if it missed anything regarding the sentencing order; defense counsel responded, “No, Your Honor.” To support its claim, -27 (Minn. 2004), which involved a petition for postconviction relief that sought to withdraw a guilty plea.
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Lewis Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In other words, the defendant must have “knowledge that the sentence actually imposed could be imposed.”
Alan Joseph Zakrajshek v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Omar Kwabena Walford v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Alan Joseph Zakrajshek v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Omar Kwabena Walford v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But a defendant may seek to withdraw a guilty plea at any time when “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
Tescil Romalis Mason-Kimmons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Tescil Romalis Mason-Kimmons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Precisely what sentence was bargained for as part of the plea agreement “is a factual inquiry for the [district] court to resolve.”
Timothy Richard Gilles v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Julian Leon Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A manifest injustice exists if the plea is not accurate, voluntary and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Terrence Demon Bailey Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-49 (Minn. 2001) (concluding that there was no due-process violation when a sentence modification resulted in a five-year conditional-release period).
Stephen Dontrail Thornton v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Rhodes , 326-327 (Minn. 2004) (distinguishing Wukawitz and Jumping Eagle because “the conditional release term was not mentioned at the sentencing hearing or included in the 13 initial sentence” and specifically quoting the portion of Wukawitz that limited the holding “to those situations where the original sente
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Timothy Kellen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Id.; (quoting Standards for Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Mario Patino Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In other words, the defendant must have “knowledge that the sentence actually imposed could be imposed.” State v. Rhodes , (quoting Standards for Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The state relies on State v. Rhodes , to argue otherwise.
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Holmes, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(applying de novo review to the “interpretation and enforcement of plea agreements”).
Abdirizak Ahmed Gayre v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 323, 326 (Minn. 2004).
State of Minnesota v. Nathaniel Ambrose Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Simon Garcia Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Elfonzo Dyrell Shelby v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Dayquan Jayru Rain Hodge Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Rufo Hamid Mumed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Nikki Jo Hauser Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Dale Dwayne Greer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The supreme court rejected an ar gument similar to appellant’s
Johnny Hernandez Perez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Determining what the parties agreed to in a plea bargain is a factual inquiry for the postconviction court to resolve.”
State of Minnesota v. Lewonda Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Leon Travis Franklin Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Anne De Perry Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Withdrawal of a guilty plea is allowed when the request is timely made and “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injusti ce.” State v. Rhodes , (citing Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Melie Ike Ilogu Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Dominique Lamar Breham Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Karissa Marie Lash Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Montez , (citing State v. Rhodes , ).
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Kendricks, III Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Virgil Ernest Beaulieu Minn. Ct. App. 2017
6 that [appellate courts] review de novo.” State v. Rhodes
State v. Montez 899 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Montez 899 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Thong v. State 892 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Thong v. State 892 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Chaz Jacobi Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Chaz Jacobi Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 686, 707 (Minn. 2008) ().
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Rae Guillette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Rae Guillette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joseph Michael Smith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joseph Michael Smith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Determining what the parties agreed to in a plea bargain is a factual inquiry for the postconviction court to resolve.”
State of Minnesota v. William James Chestnut Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William James Chestnut Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Arnold Lind-Pashina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Arnold Lind-Pashina Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION The “interpretation and enforcement of plea agreements involve issues of law that we review de novo.”
Craig Allan Hargreaves v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Craig Allan Hargreaves v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016