Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Melina v. Chaplin, 327 N.W.2d 19.

325 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. L. W., Commissioner of Human Services, Legal … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(applying Melina in a juvenile-protection matter).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: V. R. R. and M. A. H., Parents, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re Resolution Reversing the Planning Commission's Decision to Grant the Petition for an Environmental Assessment ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: V. R. R. and M. A. H., Parents, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(applying Melina in a juvenile-protection matter).
In re Resolution Reversing the Planning Commission's Decision to Grant the Petition for an Environmental Assessment ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(noting that an unbriefed issue is deemed waived).
A22-0724 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
n.1 (Minn. 1998) (applying the rul e that arguments not briefed are waived where the appellant “allude[d] to” issues but “fail[ed] to address them 15 products as franchise fees, it would significantly diminish the effect of the unambiguous language in t
A22-1469 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating inadequately briefed issues are not properly before an appellate court).
East Phillips Neighborhood Institute, Inc., et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Paul Park, (recognizing an issue was waived when commentators raised it in an administrative review process but relator did not raise the issue in their brief); (stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Marthamae Kottschade, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., because inadequately briefed issues are not properly before an app ellate court, n.1 (Minn. 1998) (applying the rule that arguments not briefed are waived in an appeal in which the appellant “allude[d] to” an issue but “fail[ed] to address them in the argument portion of his brief”).
Thomas Behrends, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(explaining that an inadequately briefed issue is not properly before an appellate court).
Troy K. Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. W. and N. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(applying the rule that arguments not argued in brief are waived).
JanOne Inc., formerly known as Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Woischke v. Stursberg & Fine, Inc., n.2 (Minn. 2018)
In re the Marriage of: Heather Elizabeth Wray-Isquierdo, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Burl Peckman Individually and as Trustee of Burl W. Peckman Living Trust, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Contested Case Hearing Request by W. Lorentz & Sons Construction. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating issues not argued in a party’s briefs are waived).
In the Matter of: Heidi Kay Wiplinger obo minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an issue not adequately briefed); Melina v. Chaplin , (deeming arguments forfeited on appeal that are unsupported by facts in the record and contain no citation to relevant legal authority).
Sharon Powers-Potter, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (providing that inadequately briefe d issues are not properly before an appellate court); Carpenter v. Woodvale, Inc. , (“While an appellant acting pro se is usually accorded some leeway in attempting to comply with court rules, [s]he is still not relieved of the
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
n.3 (Minn. 2015) (holding that failure to make a timely assertion of a right is a forfeiture of that right); (holding that issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
Irv’s Boomin’ Fireworks, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Id.; (stating that inadequately briefed issues are not properly before an appellate court).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. M. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(deeming arguments forfeited on appeal that are unsupported by facts in record).
In re the Matter of: Jill Moore, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address issue not adequately briefed); (same).
City of Hutchinson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Tonia N. Williams, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We ge nerally decline to reach issues that are inadequately briefed, Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester , as inadequately briefed issues are not properly before an appellate court
Thomas M. Fafinski, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Free Minnesota Small Business Coalition, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(stating that an issue not argued in the briefs is waived).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. O., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-21 (Minn. 1982) (holding that issues not argued on appeal are waived).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. C. and J. J. A. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Melina v. Chaplin , ( deeming arguments forfeited on appeal that are unsupported by facts in record and contain inadequate citation to relevant legal authority); see also State, Dep’t of Labor & Indus.
Freedom Kerkula, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A20-0072 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address issue not adequately briefed ); (declining to address issue not adequately briefed ); 4-65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. W., Adjudicated Father. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ola Abdelaziz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Esther Jayasheela Potti, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., n.1 (Minn. 1998) (deeming claims waived because appellant “allude[d] to” issues but “fail[ed] to address them in the argument portion of his brief”).
Allstate Indemnity Company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(declining to reach issue not argued in briefs).
Jessica Lin Love, n/k/a/ Jessica Lin Lopez Love, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Melina v. Chaplin , (deeming arguments forfeited on appeal that are unsupported by facts in the record and contain no citation to relevant legal authority).
A19-1323 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The supreme court has stated that issues not briefed on appeal are “waived.” see State, Dep’t of Labor & Indus.
In re the Custody of: R. T. R., C. T. R., and S. C. T. R., Robby Romero, … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
He raised this argument for the first time at oral argument, (issues not briefed are not properly before this court).
Town of West Lakeland, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
n.1 (Minn. 1998) (declining to consider issues raised in a brief when the appellant alluded to them but failed to “address them in the argument portion of his brief”).
Michael Noel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(issues not briefed on appeal are waived).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
William A. McClendon, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that any issue not argued in a party’s brief is d eemed waived).
In re the Estate of: Pauline Mary Serpico, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
SRRT Properties, LP, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that an appellant waives issues not briefed on appeal); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Clarence Johnson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
n.3 (Minn. 2015) (recognizing that failing to make an a ssertion of right constitutes forfeiture rather than waiver).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Patrick Hugh Stack, et al., petitioners, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Edwards Lifesciences, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“This issue was not argued in the briefs and accordingly must be deemed waived.”).
In the Matter of a Petition for Decertification of an Exclusive Representative Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(inadequately briefed issues are not properly before appellate court); Ganguli v. Univ.
Thomas A. Ruether, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Eric Joseph Vacko, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018