Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Theis, 742 N.W.2d 643.

441 citing documents.

Alan Joseph Zakrajshek v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Alan Joseph Zakrajshek v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Brent William Kruse Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Brent William Kruse Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Henry Baion Cummings Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Henry Baion Cummings Minn. 2024
Nathan Wesley McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nathan Wesley McDonald v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[M]anifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(explaining, in the context of an Alford plea, “[t]he allegations of the complaint in this case also do not satisfy .
State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Abshir Abdullahi Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Micah Montre Marrison Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Although the fair-and-just standard is “less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” State v. Theis , d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Perry Evan Helms, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Sovajie Marion Julian Temple Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Nicole Denise Longoria Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quoting North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38 (1970)).
Andrew Audstin Emerson Brown v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Although it is a lower burden, the fair-and-just standard “does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” State v. Theis , d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007) (quotation omitted).
Jamie Allen Andrews v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
accurate Alford plea involves the following: (1) a strong factual basis, (2) an admission from the defendant that the evidence is sufficient to convict him at trial, and (3) the district court’s independent conclusion that “there is a strong probability that the defendant would be found guilty of the charge to which he pleaded guilty, notwithstanding his claims of innocence.”
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Christopher Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Mark Allen Lacek Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Joshua William Dwyer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. John Lee Backen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
at 13 (quoting State v. Theis , ).
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Lee Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Michael Dale Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The accuracy requirement of a valid guilty plea protects a defendant “from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could be convicted of were he to insist on his right to trial.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Scott Adams, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jason Elliot Peterson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Merwin Andrew Coleman Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quoting North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Hector Vivas Buezo Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Eddie Markeith Frazier v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
George Dudley v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jerrmaine Winston Knowles v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Matthew Howard Isensee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Chad Lawrance Bachmeier Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Christian Bolton-Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Abdullahi Mohamud Hussen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
than the manifest-injustice standard, but it does not permit withdrawal of ‘a guilty plea for simply any reason.’” (d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007)).
State of Minnesota v. Brian Keith Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Ashaunti Quantay Prowell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If a plea fails to meet any one of these requirements, it is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Artavies Raymone Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Diedrich Allen Middleton Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The state 1A defendant enters an Alford guilty plea if he maintains his innocence but has “clearly expressed his desire to enter the plea based on his belief that the State’s evidence would be sufficient to convict him.” (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Jes Keven Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Walter Johann Happel Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Theis , (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Joseph Trombley Minn. Ct. App. 2022
at 13 (d 643, 649 (Minn. 2007)).
State of Minnesota v. Darwin Eldridge Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Theis , Minn. R. Crim.
Joshua Raymond Armendariz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
An Alford plea permits “a court to accept a defendant’s guilty plea, even though the defendant [maintains] his innocence, where the State [demonstrates] ‘a strong factual basis for the plea’ and the defendant clearly [expresses] his desire to enter the plea based on his belief that the State’s evidence would be sufficient to convict him.” (quoting North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Tracy Dean Bullock Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Theis , -49 (Minn. 2007).