Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Theis, 742 N.W.2d 643.

441 citing documents.

Herald Edward Liu v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[C]areful scrutiny of the factual basis for the plea is necessary within the context of an Alford plea because of the inherent conflict in pleading guilty while maintaining innocence.” State v. Theis , -49 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. James Earl Bailey Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Todd Deon Rolack, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Brice Killian Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2022
An inaccurate guilty plea is an invalid plea , and a “manifest injustice would occur if the plea were not withdrawn.” 0 (Minn. 2007); see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Brian John Leonida Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kim, d at 267; -51 (Minn. 2007) (noting that the holding in Kim permits “consideration of the alleged victim’s interests as prejudice to the State”).
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Bacon Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A defendant has no “absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Darren Ray Liimatainen Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An Alford plea permits “a court to accept a defendant’s guilty plea, even though th e defendant [maintains] his innocence, where the St ate [demonstrates] ‘a strong factual basis for the plea’ and the defendant clearly [expresses] his desire to enter the plea based on his belief that the State’s evidence would be sufficient to convict him.” (quoting North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970)).
Blama Jamie Koilor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dylan Matthew Deling v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“If a plea fails to meet any one of these requirements, it is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Harold Badillo Chaparro Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Although it is a lower burden than the manifest-injustice standard, the fair-and-just standard “does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” 5 (quotation omitted).
S’Emaj Avyiair Okongwu v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Dale Klitzke Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Although it is a lower burden, the fair-and-just standard “does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” State v. Theis , (quotation omitted).
Christopher Paul Mattson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(citing Alford, 400 U.S. at 38, 91 S. Ct. at 168).
State of Minnesota v. Randy Joel Bade Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[B]ecause of the inherent conflict in pleading guilty while maintaining innocence,” the factual basis for an Alford plea must “provide the court with a basis to independently conclude that there is a strong probability that the defendant would be found guilty of the charge to which he pleaded guilty.”
Jalisa Yvette Crosby v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The district court “ must allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty p lea, even after sentencing, if ‘withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Nathaniel Ambrose Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Matt Monoleetio Vogel Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
Although a defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea, a court must allow a de fendant to withdraw a guilty plea, even after sentencing, if “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” Mi nn.
State of Minnesota v. Deandre ONeil Jackman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Tommy Thomas Corrales v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Donald Albert Strobel Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Theis , d 643, 647 (Minn. 2007) (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38, 91 S. Ct. 160, 168 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Gabriel Edward Towne Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Cedric Antonio Erby Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Theis , d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Terry Allen Stewart Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Alfred Richard Einberger, III Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Catherine Ann Moore v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Mitchell Le Dac Ho v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Rioba Nyandiekda Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Meade Terrell Stademeyer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
Douglas Edwin Minor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“If a plea fails to meet any one of these requirements, it is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Zittie Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The fair-and-just standard is less demanding than the manifest-injustice standard, but does not permit withdrawal “for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Buenfil Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The fair-and-just standard is less demanding than the manifest-injustice sta ndard, but does not permit withdrawal “for simply any reason.” ().
Everett Savoy Vaughn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Teresa Michelle Peterson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 643, 650 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Jared Otha Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Lynne Dahlgren Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Under an Alford plea, a court may accept a defe ndant’s guilty plea despite th e defendant’s assertion of innocence, provided that the state demonstrates “a strong factual basis for the plea” and the defendant expresses the desire to enter the pl ea “based on [the] be lief that the [s]tate’s evidence would be sufficien t to convict [her].” State v. Theis , (quotation omitted); see also North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25, 38, 91 S. Ct. 160, 168 (1970).
State of Minnesota v. Trejuan Dominic Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Abdifatah Abdullahi Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2020
49 (Minn. 2007) (recognizing that, when a defendant pleads guilty but does not admit guilt, a factual basis may be supported through an interrogation of the defendant of the underlying conduct and the evidence that would be introduced at trial, the introduction of documents or witness statements, or both partie
State of Minnesota v. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Tescil Romalis Mason-Kimmons Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
Anthony Paul Schatz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Junting He Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38, 91 S. Ct. 160, 168 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Steven Kalland Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“If a plea fails to meet any one of these requirements, it is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Marlin Vosburg Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (“At any time the court must allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the court that withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.”); (reversing and remanding where guilty plea was not accurate).
State of Minnesota v. Vance Diwayne Laster, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
14 Although the fair-and-just standard is “ less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: William Lee Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38, 91 S. Ct. 160, 168 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Victor Ciriaco-Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Although the fair -and-just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” State v. Theis , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. David Laurence Cal Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[C]areful scrutiny of the factual basis for the plea is necessary within the context of an Alford plea because of the inherent conflict in pleading guilty while maintaining innocence.” -49 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Terrance James Leason Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Edward Dean Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”