Cited by

(quotation and citation omitted).

In the context of reviewing a conduct -based award of attorney fees, “[a]mong other ways, a district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation and citation omitted).

“[A] district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact[ual] findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation and citations omitted).

(in the context of reviewing a conduct-based award of attorney fees, stating that, “[a]mong other ways, a district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law” (quo

The purpose of a sanctions award “is to penalize only the filing of clearly meritless claims, not the advancement of losing but arguably merited claims or theories.”

d 573, 578 (Minn. App. 2010).

“[A] district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation omitted).

A. Conduct-based attorney fees Husband argues that “[b]ecause the dissipation findings are in error, the award of conduct-based fees must be reversed.” Conduct-based attorney fee awards “are discretionary with the district court.”

see also Dobrin v. Dobrin , (applying this aspect of Dobrin in an adoption appeal).

(appl ying this aspect of Dobrin in an adoption appeal).

“Amo ng other ways, a district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation and citations omitted).

d 573, 578 (Minn. App. 2010).

(quotation and citations omitted).

“[A] district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation and citation omitted).

(quotations and citations omitted).

(quotation and citations omitted).

d 573, 578 (Minn. App. 2010) (applying this aspect of Dobrin in an adoption appeal).

“The district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation omitted).

(quotation and citations omitted).

“[A] district court abuses its discretion if it acts again st logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (internal quotation and citations omitted).

.” (internal quotation and citations omitted).

(internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

“Among other ways, a district court 7 abuses its discretion if it acts against logic a nd the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotations and citations omitted).

“Among other ways, a district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported 5 by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

We will reverse only if the district court “abused its broad discretion by reaching a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record, ” Haefele, d at 708 (quotation omitted), or if it misapplies the law

“Among other ways, a district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotations and citations omitted).

A district court abuses its discretion where it “acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.” (quotation and citation omitted).

“An abuse of discretion occurs when the district court resolves the matter in a manner that is against logic and the facts on the record.” O’Donnell v. O’Donnell, (quotation omitted); (quotation omitted).

1 (2012) (stating that conduct- based fees “may” be awarded against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding); (stating, in context of reviewing conduct-based award of attorney fees, that “[a]mong other ways, a district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law”) (quotatio

(“[A] district court abuses its discretion if it acts against logic and the facts on record, or if it enters fact findings that are unsupported by the record, or if it misapplies the law.”).