Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jacob Miles Solberg, 882 N.W.2d 618.

387 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Da’Monte Si’Quan Lewis-Meghie Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Ladarryl Lipscomb Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A durational departure focuses on offense-related factors and may be appropriate if the defendant’s offense-related conduct is “significantly less serious than that typically involved in the commission of the offense.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Keng Cha Minn. Ct. App. 2026
to depart from the presumptive sentence if “identifiable, substantial, and compelling circumstances” exist, Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2022), departures “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases” because “[t]he sentencing guidelines seek to maintain uniformity, proportionality, rationality, and predictability in sentencing of felony crimes,” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Julie Louise Myhre-Schnell Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Alexander Albert Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. James Tyrone Woods Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A district court’s decision to depart from the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines must be based on “identifiable, 6 substantial, and compelling circumstances.” (quoting Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 2.D.1 (2012)).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Franklin Knoop Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Vontrez Trevon Phelps Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Victor Wade Wang Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Kelsey Marie Rutland Minn. Ct. App. 2026
4 departures from the sentencing guidelines “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Phia Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Justin Taylor Eschenbacher Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Departures from sentencing guidelines “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Misti Dawn Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 618, 623-24 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Donald Arthur Merrill Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the 12 guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. John Raymond Evers Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Jeffery Lee Niemi Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A downward durational departure results in a sentence that is shorter in length than the presumptive sentence and is based on “the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.”
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A “downward dispositional departure occurs when the presumptive guidelines sentence calls for imprisonment but the district court instead stays execution or imposition of the sentence.” see also Minn. 6 Sent’g Guidelines 1.B.5.a(2) (2015).
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Michael Edberg Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“[A] durational departure is a sentence that departs in length from the presumptive guidelines range.”
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Richard Fenske Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Randal Darrell Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Kappon Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Luke Joshua Cain v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Neil Wentz Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its reasons for departure are legally impermissible and insufficient evidence in the record justifies the departure.”
State of Minnesota v. Donald Arthur Zawchenuk Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Juan Antonio Soto, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Michael Leistiko Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“When the district court gives improper or inadequate reasons for a downward departure, [the appellate court] may scrutinize the record to determine whether alternative grounds support the departure.”6 (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Joseph Jesmer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But departures “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Allen Severtson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A dispositional departure places the offender in a different setting than that called for by the presumptive guidelines sentence.”
State of Minnesota v. Paul Lewis Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Roger Lee Voss, III Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Paul Lewis Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Roger Lee Voss, III Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(citation omitted); (noting that the guidelines seek to “maintain uniformity, proportionality, rationality, and predictability in sentencing of felony crimes” (citation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Lester Ray Wiley Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Because the [sentencing] guidelines’ goal is to create uniformity in sentencing, departures are justified only in exceptional cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Zerick Allen Michael McClinn Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Dayonne Marquis Lachapelle Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Dayonne Marquis Lachapelle Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minn. Sent’g Guidelines 1.B.5.a(2) (2022).
State of Minnesota v. Cherry Lynn Osborne Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Departures from sentencing guidelines “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Irineo Ricardo-Cosme Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Irineo Ricardo-Cosme Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But departures “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases” because “[t]he sentencing guidelines seek to maintain uniformity, proportionality, rationality, and predictability in sentencing of felony crimes.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tyler James Kennedy Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Tyler James Kennedy Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Consequently, departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Jamison Franklin Wells Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Departures from sentencing guidelines “are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.”
State of Minnesota v. Samuel David Teachman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“[A] downward dispositional departure occurs when the presumptive guidelines sentence calls for imprisonment but the district court instead stays execution or imposition of the sentence.”
State of Minnesota v. John Robert Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts “review a district court’s decision to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Philip Kofi Itoka Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Therefore, “departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” State v. Solberg
State of Minnesota v. Lee Daniel Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Lee Daniel Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Bryant Wayne Paige Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Bryant Wayne Paige Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A durational departure is a sentence that departs in length from the presumptive guidelines range” and “must be based on factors that reflect the seriousness of the offense, not the characteristics of the offender.” (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Aaron Fierro Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Therefore, “departures from the guidelines are discouraged and are intended to apply to a small number of cases.” 623 (Minn. 2016).