Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Lyon v. Lyon, 439 N.W.2d 18.

74 citing documents.

In Re the Marriage of Minn. Ct. App. 2026
1 (2024); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
1 (2024); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1 (2022); (stating that award of spousal maintenance requires showing of need).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1 (2022); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Honke, d at 266; (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Jo Pemberton, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An award of “[spousal] maintenance depends on a showing of need.”
In re the Marriage of: Diane Faye Meyer, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that an award of spousal 7 maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1 (2022); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1; see Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Richard Leo Bassing, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1(a) (2022); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showin g of need).
In re the Marriage of: Jeannine Colleen Scott Salchow, n/k/a Jeannine Colleen Farnsworth, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1 (2020); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1 (2020); (stating that an award of maintenance depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1(a), (b); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Martin Sean Schmidt, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Julie Ann Schmidt, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
("Even allowing for income taxes, the wife's net income will comfortably exceed her living expenses ....
Charles Edward Honke, Minn. 2021
“[A]n award of maintenance ‘depends on a showing of need.’ ” Curtis, d at 252 ().
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1; (providing that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
21 (Minn. 1989); review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1 (2018); see Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1(a), (b); (noting that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
ver’ is money not needed.” So, he contends, the district court’s award to wife of more maintenance than she needs to meet the line -item expenses in her budget stems from the flawed rationale that “the marital standard of living require[d] [wife] to have extra income available at the end of the month.” Husband relies on Lyon v. Lyon , to assert that “[m]oney ‘left over’ is money not needed.”
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
.”); (stating “maintenance depends on a showing of need”); Peterka v. Peterka , (articulating purpose of spousal maintenance as allowing “the recipient and the obligor to have a standard of living that appro ximates the marital standard of living, as closely as i
In re the Marriage of: Edith Ponciano, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018) ; see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need) .
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(citing Minn. Stat. § 518.552, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Richard T. Hudgins, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1(a)-(b) (2018); (stating that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Cynthia A. Linnerooth, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); (stating that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); (making need for maintenance a prerequisite for an award of maintenance).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Susan Lee Wood, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018); see Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1(a), (b) (201 8); Lyon v. Lyon , d 18, 22 (Minn. 1989) (noting that “[m]aintenance depends on a showing of need”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1(b); see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need) .
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[M]aintenance is awarded to meet need, [and it] depends on a showing of need.” Lyon v. Lyon
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1 (2016); (stating that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need).
A17-1036 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Under Minnesota law, “an award of maintenance ‘depends on a showing of need’ but even an unemployable spouse ‘is not by that fact alone necessarily entitled to maintenance.’” Curtis, d at 252 (quoting Lyon v. Lyon , ).
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1 (2014); (noting that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need, even if the statute is otherwise satisfied).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1 (2016); (stating that maintenance award depends on showing need).
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1 (2016); (stating maintenance award depends on showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Robert David Stoffey, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lyon v. Lyon , , 22 (Minn. 1989) (reversing award of maintenance where wife’s annual income from her share of marital property met her need).
In re the Marriage of: Dennis Lee Polla, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1 (2016); (stating that maintenance award depends on showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
Under the statute, an award of maintenance “depends on a showing of need” but even an unemployable spouse “is not by that fact alone necessarily entitled to maintenance.”