Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Lyon v. Lyon, 439 N.W.2d 18.

74 citing documents.

In Re the Marriage of Joshua Laurance Patterson v. Rebecca Marie Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
1 (2024); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Michael Raymond Baer v. Kelley Michelle Baer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
1 (2024); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of Zachary Dean Hollingsworth v. Anne Marie Halling Roe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Russell Preusse v. Amanda Jayne Preusse Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1 (2022); (stating that award of spousal maintenance requires showing of need).
In Re the Marriage of: Katherine Patterson v. Jerry Lyn Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1 (2022); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Tracie Kay Fowler v. Erwin James Fowler, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Honke, d at 266; (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Jo Pemberton v. Stephen Blake Pemberton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An award of “[spousal] maintenance depends on a showing of need.”
In re the Marriage of: Diane Faye Meyer v. Chad Allen Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that an award of spousal 7 maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Pawel Dominik Rzeczkowski v. Carolina Uribe Borrero Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1 (2022); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Russell Vander Wiel v. Sharna Ann Wahlgren Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1; see Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Richard Leo Bassing v. Barbara Laraine Bassing Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1(a) (2022); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showin g of need).
In re the Marriage of: Jeannine Colleen Scott Salchow, n/k/a Jeannine Colleen Farnsworth v. Kenneth Joe Salchow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1 (2020); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie Wingad Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1 (2020); (stating that an award of maintenance depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker v. Laura Margaret Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1(a), (b); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Martin Sean Schmidt v. Julie Ann Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2021
("Even allowing for income taxes, the wife's net income will comfortably exceed her living expenses ....
Charles Edward Honke v. Jennifer Hodapp Honke Minn. 2021
“[A]n award of maintenance ‘depends on a showing of need.’ ” Curtis, d at 252 ().
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha v. Deepak Kademani Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1; (providing that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni v. Sonal A. Sidhwani Minn. Ct. App. 2021
21 (Minn. 1989); review denied (Minn. Dec.
In re the Marriage of: Caryn Blaine Evans v. Keith Eric Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2021
1 (2018); see Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne v. John Justin Wauzynski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1(a), (b); (noting that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Timothy John Goettl v. Tonna Lorraine Goettl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
ver’ is money not needed.” So, he contends, the district court’s award to wife of more maintenance than she needs to meet the line -item expenses in her budget stems from the flawed rationale that “the marital standard of living require[d] [wife] to have extra income available at the end of the month.” Husband relies on Lyon v. Lyon , to assert that “[m]oney ‘left over’ is money not needed.”
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal v. Keith Solomon Moheban Minn. Ct. App. 2020
.”); (stating “maintenance depends on a showing of need”); Peterka v. Peterka , (articulating purpose of spousal maintenance as allowing “the recipient and the obligor to have a standard of living that appro ximates the marital standard of living, as closely as i
In re the Marriage of: Edith Ponciano v. Felix Murillo Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie v. Heidi Christine Aufenthie Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018) ; see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need) .
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg v. Karen Lisa Yashar Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(citing Minn. Stat. § 518.552, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Richard T. Hudgins v. Margaret Foster Hudgins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Christina L. Suhsen v. Karl W. Suhsen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1(a)-(b) (2018); (stating that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Cynthia A. Linnerooth v. Gerald R. Linnerooth Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); (stating that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler v. Michelle Marie Keeler Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 (2018); (making need for maintenance a prerequisite for an award of maintenance).
In re the Marriage of: Judy Ann Jacques v. Nicholas Melvin Jacques Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018); (stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Susan Lee Wood v. Brad Wesley Wood Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018); see Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that an award of spousal maintenance depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders v. Joseph James Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris v. Robert Lee Hiniker Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1(a), (b) (201 8); Lyon v. Lyon , d 18, 22 (Minn. 1989) (noting that “[m]aintenance depends on a showing of need”).
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas James Davis v. Theresa Anne Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1(b); see also Lyon v. Lyon , (stating that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need) .
In re the Marriage of: Bijoy Raghavan v. Smeeta Antony Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan v. Jacqueline Ann Hoolihan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[M]aintenance is awarded to meet need, [and it] depends on a showing of need.” Lyon v. Lyon
In re the Marriage of: James Patrick Pnewski v. Joan Susanne Pnewski Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1 (2016); (stating that a maintenance award depends on a showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Justin James Jurkovich v. Rebecca Jean Jurkovich Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Under Minnesota law, “an award of maintenance ‘depends on a showing of need’ but even an unemployable spouse ‘is not by that fact alone necessarily entitled to maintenance.’” Curtis, d at 252 (quoting Lyon v. Lyon , ).
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran v. Vadivazhaghi Kannan Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1 (2014); (noting that an award of maintenance requires a showing of need, even if the statute is otherwise satisfied).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green v. Julie Ann Green Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1 (2016); (stating that maintenance award depends on showing need).
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher v. Benjamin Moore Belcher, III Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1 (2016); (stating maintenance award depends on showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Robert David Stoffey v. Mari Lou Stoffey Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lyon v. Lyon , , 22 (Minn. 1989) (reversing award of maintenance where wife’s annual income from her share of marital property met her need).
In re the Marriage of: Dennis Lee Polla v. Jolene Theresa Polla, n/k/a Jolene Theresa Chan Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1 (2016); (stating that maintenance award depends on showing of need).
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
Under the statute, an award of maintenance “depends on a showing of need” but even an unemployable spouse “is not by that fact alone necessarily entitled to maintenance.”