Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriage Soto, Jr., 855 N.W.2d 303.

681 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Samson Odey Finch Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Douglas Wayne Braker v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The guidelines provide a nonexclusive list of mitigating factors that may warrant a dispositional departure, including when the defendant is “particularly amenable to probation.” State v. Soto
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Cory Wiedeman Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We afford the [district] court great di scretion in the imposition of sentences and reverse sentencing decisions only fo r an abuse of that discretion.” State v. Soto , -08 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Rafie Mullins Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Baldwin Minn. Ct. App. 2022
8 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Kent Pioro Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 303, 307–08 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Tony James Hewitt Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Soto , (citing Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Derek Steven Serbus Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Terrance Lee Tonnessen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Winston Eckman Minn. Ct. App. 2022
DECISION District courts are afforded “great di scretion in the imposition of sentences,” and appellate courts will reverse a sentencing decision “only for an abuse of that discretion.” State v. Soto , - 08 (Minn. 2014) (quotatio n omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Edward David Stahlmann Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A downward dispositiona l departure may be appropriate if a defendant shows a “particular amenability to individualized treatment in a probationary setting.” (quoting State v. Trog , ).
State of Minnesota v. Mario Patino Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Lidio Roque Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Frederick Duane Fisher Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Richard Schwab Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Tracy Dean Bullock Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Soto , 08 (Minn. 2014); Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Blake Scott Veen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Travis James Zander Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jaren Joseph Dodds Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Scott Hurst Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Rayjon Matthew Willis Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Lynn Jansen Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The district court can impose a departure from the guidelines “ only if aggravating or mitigating circumstances are present, and those circumstances provide a substantial and compelling reason not to impose a guidelines sentence.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Isaac Alonzo Cryer Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Tywan George Christopher Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Peter Devonn Crosby v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
5 “We ‘afford the [district] court great discretion in the imposition of sentences’ and reverse sentencing decisions onl y for an abuse of that discretion.” State v. Soto , -08 (Minn. 2014) (quoting State v. Spain , ).
State of Minnesota v. Sonya Faye Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Devon Deshawn Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
DECISION Appellate courts “afford the [district] court great discretion in the imposition of sentences and reverse sentencing decisions on ly for an abuse of that discretion.” -08 (Minn. 2014) (quot ation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Reviewing courts “afford the trial court great discretion in the imposition of sentences and reverse sentencing decisions only for an abuse of that discretion.” –08 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michele Anne Reimann Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Guidelines 2.D.1 (2020); (M inn.
State of Minnesota v. Ihar Daniliuk Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Guidelines 2.D.1 (Supp. 2019)
State of Minnesota v. Todd Gerald Pletcher Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Brian John Leonida Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Jacob Elmo Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Guidelines 2.D.1 (Supp. 2017); d 303, 308 (Minn. 2014) (stating a district court may only depart from the guidelines if there is a substantial and compelling reason to do so).
State of Minnesota v. Tony Xiong Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Appellate courts “afford the [district] court great discretion in the imposition of sentences and reverse sentencing decisions only for an abuse of that discretion.” -08 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Armando Padilla Minn. Ct. App. 2021
4 “We afford the [ district] court great discretion in the imposition of sentences and reverse sentencing decisions only for an abuse of that discretion.” -08 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Martell Antonio Bloxson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotations omitted) ( and Minn. Sent.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dwayne Leckner Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See State v. Soto , -08 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Rex Christopher Kersey Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Soto , , 308 (Minn. 2014) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Bobo, III Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 303, 307-08 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. John Arlo Bowen Omaha Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Randy Joel Bade Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Galle Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[A] sentencing court can exercise its di scretion to depart from the guidelines only if aggravating or mitigating circumstances are present, and those circumstances provide a substantial and compelling reason not to impose a guidelines sentence.” (quotations and citations omitte d).
State of Minnesota v. Angel Gabriel Aviles Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Elijah Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We afford the [district] court great di scretion in the imposition of sentences and reverse sentencing decisions only for an abuse of that discretion.” State v. Soto , -08 (Minn. 20 14) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Shane Kirby Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Soto , -08 (Minn. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Jonathon Ross Rudquist Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Bobbie Christine Bishop Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Charles Clinton Ames Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Soto , (quotation omitted).