Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dikken v. State, 896 N.W.2d 873.

94 citing documents.

Stephen Dontrail Thornton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“To be intelligent, a guilty plea must represent a knowing and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action available.” (quotation omitted).
Yaasiin Aweis Isxaaq, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“[A] plea is involuntary when it is induced by coercive or deceptive action,” such as “actual or threatened physical harm, .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A guilty plea is voluntary if it is not “based on any improper pressures or inducements.” Dikken v. State , - 77 (Minn. 2017) (citation omitted).
Edward Richard Krasky, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nikita Nikel Dixon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-77 (Minn. 2017) (“To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on any improper pressures or inducements.”).
Blama Jamie Koilor, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Whether a plea is intelligent depends on what the defendant knew at the time that the guilty plea was entered, and requires that the defendant understand the charges brought, the rights waived, and the consequences of entering a guilty plea, State v. Raleigh , (M inn.
Roy Lee Smith, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“To be intelligent, a guilty plea must represent[] a k nowing and intelligent choice [among] the alternative courses of action available.” (quotation omitted).
Eric Kenny Hagerman, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dikken v. State , 76 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (quotation omitted).
Elfonzo Dyrell Shelby, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The state applies improper pressure if it “induce[s] a guilty plea base d on a promise by the prosecutor that goes unfulfilled or was unfulf illable from the start.” Dikken v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that “a valid guilty plea waives all non -jurisdictional defects arising prior to the entry of the plea” (quotation omitted)).
Everett Savoy Vaughn, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A plea is involuntary if it is based on “improper pressures or inducements” or was procured through “coercive or deceptive action.” –77 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
Jetaun Helen Wheeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it has been entered.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A19-1330 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 873, 878 (Minn. 2017).
Anthony Paul Schatz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A] plea is involuntary when it is induced by coercive or deceptive action.” Dikken v. State
Nathan Christopher Braun, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it [has been] entered.” Dikken v. State , (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ronnie Bila Shaka, Petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on any imp roper pressures or inducements.” -77 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether a plea is intelligent depends on what the defendant knew at the time he entered the plea.” d 873, 877 (Minn. 2017).
Berkeley Read Lewis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“But the [s]tate also cannot induce a guilty plea based on a promise by the prosecutor that goes unfulfilled or was unfulfillable from the start, such as a plea agreement involving the promise of an illegal sentence.”).
Johnson v. State 925 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Johnson v. State 925 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on any improper pressures or inducements.” –77 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
State v. Nicholas 924 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Nicholas 924 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
Charles Winston, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1, which exists if a guilty plea is inaccurate, unintelligent, or involun tary, Dikken v. State, 7 ; State v. Raleigh , .
Johnson v. State 916 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2018
Johnson v. State 916 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2018
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017).
A17-0883 Minn. 2018
Joseph Duane Gustafson, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017).
David Walt Studanski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The supreme court has 6 also stated that “the Stat e also cannot induce a guilty pl ea based on a promise by the prosecutor that goes unfulfilled or was unfulfillable from the start, such as a plea agreement involving the promise of an illegal sentence.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
At one extreme, the government may not produce a plea through actual or threatened physical harm, or by mental coercion overbearing the will of the defendant.” (quotations omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by