Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dikken v. State, 896 N.W.2d 873.
-
George Dudley v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellant argues he is “entitled to withdraw his [guilty] plea because it was the product of the [district] court improperly forcing [ him] to be represented by [ counsel].” But a “valid guilty plea waives all non- jurisdictional defects arising prior to the entry of the plea.”6 d 873, 878 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted); see also Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973) (“[A] guilty plea represents a break in the chain of events which has preceded it in the criminal process.
-
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Scott Landwehr
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that guilty plea is involuntary when “based on a promise by the prosecutor that goes unfulfilled”); (stating that defendant should be allowed to withdraw guilty plea if an unqualified promise as to sentence is not fulfilled).
-
Stephen Dontrail Thornton v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“To be intelligent, a guilty plea must represent a knowing and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action available.” (quotation omitted).
- Yaasiin Aweis Isxaaq v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota v. Artavies Raymone Moore
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“[A] plea is involuntary when it is induced by coercive or deceptive action,” such as “actual or threatened physical harm, .
- State of Minnesota v. John Herbert Hodge, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Darryl Donail Walker, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota v. James Tyjuan Moore
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A guilty plea is voluntary if it is not “based on any improper pressures or inducements.” Dikken v. State , - 77 (Minn. 2017) (citation omitted).
- Edward Richard Krasky v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
Nikita Nikel Dixon v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-77 (Minn. 2017) (“To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on any improper pressures or inducements.”).
-
Blama Jamie Koilor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Whether a plea is intelligent depends on what the defendant knew at the time that the guilty plea was entered, and requires that the defendant understand the charges brought, the rights waived, and the consequences of entering a guilty plea, State v. Raleigh , (M inn.
- Roy Lee Smith, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Jeffrey Herron Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota v. Terrell Theo Payne
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“To be intelligent, a guilty plea must represent[] a k nowing and intelligent choice [among] the alternative courses of action available.” (quotation omitted).
-
Eric Kenny Hagerman v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dikken v. State , 76 (Minn. 2017).
- State of Minnesota v. William Deshawn Paige Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
State of Minnesota v. Alipio Santiago Veitia
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“To be valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” (quotation omitted).
-
Elfonzo Dyrell Shelby v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The state applies improper pressure if it “induce[s] a guilty plea base d on a promise by the prosecutor that goes unfulfilled or was unfulf illable from the start.” Dikken v. State
-
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Guzik
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that “a valid guilty plea waives all non -jurisdictional defects arising prior to the entry of the plea” (quotation omitted)).
-
Everett Savoy Vaughn v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A plea is involuntary if it is based on “improper pressures or inducements” or was procured through “coercive or deceptive action.” –77 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
-
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it has been entered.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Jessica Lynne Dahlgren Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota v. Trejuan Dominic Miller
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 873, 878 (Minn. 2017).
- Anthony Paul Schatz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota v. Alan Danny Woods
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A] plea is involuntary when it is induced by coercive or deceptive action.” Dikken v. State
-
Nathan Christopher Braun v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once it [has been] entered.” Dikken v. State , (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Dale Dwayne Greer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Ronnie Bila Shaka v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on any imp roper pressures or inducements.” -77 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Adam John Berge Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State of Minnesota v. Scott David Quall
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether a plea is intelligent depends on what the defendant knew at the time he entered the plea.” d 873, 877 (Minn. 2017).
- Berkeley Read Lewis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State of Minnesota v. Leon Travis Franklin
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“But the [s]tate also cannot induce a guilty plea based on a promise by the prosecutor that goes unfulfilled or was unfulfillable from the start, such as a plea agreement involving the promise of an illegal sentence.”).
- Johnson v. State 925 N.W.2d 287 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Johnson v. State
925 N.W.2d 287
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017).
-
State of Minnesota v. Rick William Olsen
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“To be voluntary, a guilty plea may not be based on any improper pressures or inducements.” –77 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
- State v. Nicholas 924 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State v. Nicholas
924 N.W.2d 286
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
-
Charles Winston v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1, which exists if a guilty plea is inaccurate, unintelligent, or involun tary, Dikken v. State, 7 ; State v. Raleigh , .
- Johnson v. State 916 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2018
-
Johnson v. State
916 N.W.2d 674
Minn. 2018
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017).
- A17-0883 Minn. 2018
- Joseph Duane Gustafson, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
-
Wayne v. State
912 N.W.2d 633
Minn. 2018
Dikken v. State , , 876 (Minn. 2017).
-
David Walt Studanski v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The supreme court has 6 also stated that “the Stat e also cannot induce a guilty pl ea based on a promise by the prosecutor that goes unfulfilled or was unfulfillable from the start, such as a plea agreement involving the promise of an illegal sentence.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Erik Charles Knutson
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
At one extreme, the government may not produce a plea through actual or threatened physical harm, or by mental coercion overbearing the will of the defendant.” (quotations omitted).