Cited by

omplaint as an additional factual basis for Sanchez’s guilty plea “with the limitation reflected in the objection from [defense counsel].” It is true, as Sanchez argues, that a guilty plea’s factual basis “is inadequate when the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty.”

d 391, 394 , 396, 399 (Minn. 2024) (citing State v. Iverson , d 346, 350 (Minn. 2003) for the proposition that, for a guilty plea to be accepted, any statement of the defendant that negates an element of the crime must be withdrawn or corrected).

Suggs argues that his guilty plea to domestic assault was inaccurate and, therefore, invalid.1 For a plea to be accurate, it must be supported by a proper factual basis, with “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).

For a guilty plea to be accurate, it must be supported by a proper factual basis, with “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which [the defendant] desires to plead guilty.” -50 (Minn. 2003) (quotation omitted).

(-50 (Minn. 2003)), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.

The factual basis must provide “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” State 8 v. Iverson, (quotation omitted).

“To be accurate, a plea must be established on a proper factual basis,” Raleigh, d at 94, which requires “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty,” (quotation omitted).

“[A] factual basis is inadequate when the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty .” State v. Iverson , (quotation omitted).

A proper factual basis exists if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).

5 5 In a few of our decisions, we have framed the factual basis requirement as demanding “evidence that the defendant’s conduct meets all elements of the offense to which he is pleading guilty.” See, (emphasis added) ( (stating that “[t]he factual basis of a plea is inadequate when the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty”)).

A factual basis is inadequate if “the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime,” unless 9 the guilty plea is rehabilitated.

Pertinent to this case, a plea’s factual basis “is inadequate when the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty.”

For a guilty plea to be accurate, “there must be sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).

For a plea to be accurate, a plea 4 must be supported by a proper factual basis, with “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charges to which he desires to plead guilty.” -50 (Minn. 2003) (quotation omitted).

To satisfy the accuracy requirement, a plea must be supported by a proper factual basis, with “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” State v. Iverson , -50 (Minn. 2003) (quotation omitted).

A factual basis is inadequate, though, “when the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime,” unless the defendant subsequently withdraws or corrects the statement, or the guilty plea is otherwise rehabilitated.

A proper factual basis exists if there are 5 “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).

(stating a defendant is free 5 to appeal from a judgment of conviction and argue that the record at the time of the plea was inadequate); (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

at 182; -55 (Minn. 2003).

The defendant’s admissions at the plea hearing must “support a conclusion that [his] conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).

Jones also argues that his plea is inaccurate because he uttered a statement of innocence during the prosecutor’s enhanceability inquiry.2 W hen a defendant denies an essential element of an offense or states a fact that is inconsistent with the facts necessary to establish an essential element of the offense during the plea colloquy, the factual basis is inadequate , unless the defendant subsequently corrects the statement and admits the necessary facts or the record otherwise establishes guilt

The defendant’s testimony must “support a conclusion that [the] defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty,” and therefore, a guilty plea is invalid as inaccurate if the defendant’s testimony “negate[s] an essential element of the charged crime.” -50 (Minn. 2003) (quotation omitted).

State v. Iverson , –50 (Minn. 2003); (holding that a guilty plea was inadequate when the defendant’s plea indicated that he did not “know” about the predatory registration requirement, thus negating the “knowingly” element of the crime).

“The factual basis of a plea is inadequate when the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty.”

(stating that a defendant “is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and contend that the record made at the time the plea was entered is inadequate” ).

“For a guilty plea to be accurate, a factual basis must be established showing that the defendant’s conduct meets all elements of the offense to which he is pleading guilty.” Jones, d at 779; -50 (Minn. 2003).

A proper factual basis exists if there are “‘sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.’” (quoting Kelsey v. State , ).

27, 2019); see also State v. Iverson , -50 (Minn. 2003).

4 A guilty plea is accurate if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” -50 (Minn. 2003) (quotation omitted).

In turn, a plea is supported by a proper factual basis if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” State v. Iverson , 9 (Minn. 2003) (quo tation omitted).

“For a guilty plea to be accurate, a factual basis must be established showing that the defendant’s conduct meets all elements of the offense to which he is pleading guilty.” Jones, d at 779; see also State v. Iverson , -50 (Minn. 2003).

“Accuracy requires that the plea be supported by a proper factual basis, that there must be sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” State v. Iverson , (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

A factual basis “is inadequate when the defendant makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty.”

“A ccuracy requires that the plea be supported by a proper factual basis[:] that there must be sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).

When a defendant “makes statements that negate an essential element of the charged crime,” the plea is inadequate “because such statements are inconsistent with a plea of guilty.”