Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Perkins v. State, 559 N.W.2d 678.

224 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Deandre Ladarryl Lipscomb Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Dpree Shareef Robinson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 678, 689-90 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Lynn Bardine Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Alfredo Torrez Minn. 2026
See, (stating that, in the plea-petition context, “[d]istrict court judges are free to adopt local rules of practice that are not in conflict with state rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court”).
Ricardo Daniel Peralta Gutierrez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. David Devon Bryant Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court rejected a
Steven Robert Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Steven Robert Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But a defendant may withdraw a guilty plea “after sentencing upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the [district] court that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quotations omitted); see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Steven Jeffrey Mueller Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A [m]anifest injustice occurs if a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Henry Wellner Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“M anifest injustice occurs when a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, or intelligent.” Perkins v. State
Andrew Charles Patton v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Germaine Yurii Butler v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A defendant may withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the [postconviction] court that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (citing Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Jagger Crawford Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Jagger Crawford Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding, despite defendant’s contrary 19 assertions, that the record established that when defendant pleaded guilty, he understood the maximum sentence that could be imposed, based in part on his signature on a petition to plead guilty, which c
State of Minnesota v. Aleshia Lynn Becklund Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deontranelle Leslie Davis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Maurice Culpepper v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Perkins v. State , Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Julian Leon Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Gail Lynn Schauer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
.” (d 678, 688 (Minn. 1997)).
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Christian Bolton-Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Ashaunti Quantay Prowell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” .
State of Minnesota v. Artavies Raymone Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Todd Deon Rolack, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 678, 690 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Ricardo O’Neal Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Jamia Lee Griffith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A criminal defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once entered.” Perkins v. State
State of Minnesota v. Cedric Antonio Erby Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Mitchell Le Dac Ho v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Douglas Edwin Minor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Dayquan Jayru Rain Hodge Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Darren Lee Whitelow Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Trejuan Dominic Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Terrance James Leason Minn. Ct. App. 2020
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
Minn. 2020
The criminal-sexual-conduct cases in which we have upheld greater- than-double durational departures are significantly different than this count.4 Notably, they 4 – 92 (Minn. 1997) (affirming a greater- than-double durational departure for first-degree criminal sexual conduct when the defendant threatened to kill the victim’s children, inflicted “gratuitous acts of violence” on her, and knew that he had AIDS when he committed the offense); Rairdon, d at 327 (fin
Felix Kasper Piah v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
14 To meet the manifest-injustice standard, the defendant must show that the plea was “not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Eric Thomas Grondahl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Manifest injustice occurs if a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent, and thus the plea may be withdrawn.” Perkins v. State
Erick Lamont Lindsey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Guy Robert Franklin Rabold Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Deon Lashawn Mallett v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Aleshia Lynn Becklund Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Douglas Ratcliff Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Fikret Konjaric Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. David Michael Dillard Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Travers Davel McDaniel Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Luis Alberto Bravomorales Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Spencer Perkins Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Perkins v. State
State of Minnesota v. Anddrew Leta Ole Fua Sesifeo Hawkins Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Ozell Ellis Lashaun Hardy Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Wilondae Daron Easter Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. David Joseph Madrigal Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Perkins v. State
State of Minnesota v. Zacharia Dahir Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A defendant can establish manifest injustice by showing that the plea was ‘not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.’” Lopez, d at 382 (quoting Perkins v. State , ).