Cited by

See In re Welfare of Child 17 of D.L.D., -23 (Minn. App. 2015) (determining that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

When reviewing a TLC order, this court reviews a district court’s “factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for an abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

–23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

“On appeal of a juvenile-protection order, we review the juvenile court’s factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” (reviewing order transferring legal custody of child), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); see also Minn. Stat. § 260C.607, subd 6(c), (e) (2022).

rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

8 (applying prejudicial-error analysis in a transfer-of-custody case on appeal), rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

On appeal from a district court’s CHIPS determination , “we review the [district] court’s factual findings for clear error.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) ; see In re Civ.

6 rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 321 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

see A.H., d at 5 (citing this aspect of Stern in a post -permanency placement dispute); –25 (Minn. App. 2015) (citing this aspect of Stern in a transfer-of-custody dispute), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

(reviewing the facts underlying a decision to transfer legal custody for clear error and the ultimate decision for an abuse of discretion), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

S.E.P., d at 387; -23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); -902 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

(reviewing order transferring legal custody of child), rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

We review the district court’s “factual findings for clear error .” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

See In re Welfare of Child of D.L.D., 6 (concluding that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

of A.D.B., ; rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) ; (stating that “[w]hen statutes explicitly entrust the district court to determine what is appropriate, we review for an abuse of discretion”).

at 87, and we review the district court’s determination of whether the efforts the county provided are reasonable under the circumstances of that particular case for an abuse of discretion, rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015) (reviewing reasonable-efforts determination for an abuse of discretion), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

S.E.P., d at 387; -23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) (applying an abuse- of-discretion standard of review).

d 315, 322–23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev .

(stating that it is possible that “a child cannot safely return home even though the factual bases for the conditions preventing the child’s return home are not identical to the factual bases for the conditions that led to the child ’s out -of-home placement”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 20

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); - 902 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

See A.M.C., d at 660 (“When statutes explicitly entrust the district court to determine what is appropriate, we review for an abuse of discretion”); rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) (concluding that appellate courts review a district court’s decision that the social services agency made reasonable efforts for an abuse of discretion).

-22 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); see also In re Welfare of Child.

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) (using two-part standard of review: clear error for district court’s underlying findings of fact and abuse of discretion for district court’s determination of whether efforts were reasonable).

S.E.P., d at 387; –23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) (applying an abuse of discretion standard of review).

23 (Minn. App. 2015) rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

- 22 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); see also In re Welfare of Child.

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-22 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Jul.

(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); see also A.M.C., d at 660 (defining an abuse of discretion as a determination that is against logic or contrary to the facts).

d 315, 322-23 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

6, 2012); -22 (Minn. App. 2015) (citing J.R.B., d at 900-01), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 323 (Minn. App. 2015) (abuse of discretion).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).