Cited by

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

But “[e]ven if [a] parent eliminates the factual bases that existed at the time of the child’s removal, if a new factual basis arises after removal, the condition cannot be corrected until that new factual basis also has been eliminated.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

1; review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 2 0, 2015).

(ruling that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

- 22 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

(liberally construing fa ther’s pleading obliga tions in petitioning for permanency, which required father to establish a prima facie case for transfer of permanent custody), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015); J.R.B., d at 905.

Given the conflicting evidence , we do not have a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) .

2(b).” In appeals from a permanent placement order involving the transfer of legal custody, this court “review[s] the juvenile court’s factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

See In re Welfare of Child of : D.L.D., (ruli ng that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 321 -22 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 321-22 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied ( M i n n .

review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

- 22 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

d 315, 323 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015)

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 321 –22 (Minn. App. 2015 ), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

d 315, 321-22 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

d 315, 321–22 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

“We review the juvenile court’s factual findings for clear error and its findings of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015); see also In re Welfare of Child of B.A.B.

(“A juvenile court may find that a child cannot safely return home even though the factual bases for the conditions preventing th e child’s return home are not identical to the factual bases for the conditions that led to the child’s out -of-home placement.”), review denied (Minn. July 2 1

laced into foster care to begin with.” But this court has held, in an analogous context, that “[a district] court may find that a child cannot safely return home even though the fac tual bases for the conditions preventing the child’s return home are not identical to the factual bases for the c onditions that led to the child’ s out -of-home placement .” 16-17 (Minn. App. 2015) (affirming child -protection permanency disposition transferring legal and physical custody of a child from a mother to

-22 (Minn. App. 2015) (citing In re Welfare of Children of J.R.B.

review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

(“Even if the parent eliminates the factual bases that existed at the time of the child’s removal, if a new factual basis arises after removal, the condition cannot be corrected until that new factual basis also has been eliminated.”), review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

“On appeal of a juvenile -protection order, we review the juvenile court’s factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 321 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

-21 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

15 (2014) (“‘May’ is permissive”); (providing that this court reviews a district court’s decision to transfer permanent custody for abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

“On appeal of a juvenile-protection order, we review the juvenile court’s factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

(“That the factual bases for the condition at the time of the adjudicatory hearing were not identical to the factual bases for the condition at the time 11 of removal does not undermine the juvenile court’s statutory finding that the overall co

9 Furthermore this court has held, “Even if the parent eliminates the factual bases that existed at the time of the child’s removal, if a new factual basis arises after removal, the condition [for keeping the child out of the home] cannot be corrected until that new factual basis also has been eliminated.” review denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).